Class in Session: A History in Classification
July 24, 2017
By Rob Kaminski
MHSAA benchmarks editor
This is the first part in a series on MHSAA tournament classification, past and present, that will be published over the next two weeks. This series originally ran in this spring's edition of MHSAA benchmarks.
Conversation and discussion at the March 2017 MHSAA Representative Council Meeting leaned heavily toward the subject of 8-Player Football and how to properly balance its tournament with the growing number of schools sponsoring the sport.
While the proposal to split the tournament into two divisions beginning with the 2017 school year was adopted, the MHSAA then faced questions such as when to set the divisions, how to determine qualifiers and where to host the championship games.
The topic continues to create a buzz in Class D schools across both peninsulas, and likely will do into the start of school this fall.
Likewise, the lone holdouts still conducting tournaments by class – MHSAA Boys and Girls Basketball and Girls Volleyball – took center stage at the May Council discussion, and following the 2017-18 school year, class is out for good. Both genders of basketball, and girls volleyball, will move to divisional formats thereafter.
There is much to be decided to be sure; but as those in education are well aware, history is the best teacher.
Fortunately for the sports in flux and for all sports under the governance of the MHSAA, the Association more or less wrote the book on the subject of sport classification. Following is a history lesson, with a little advanced division thrown in.
Class structure
Credited with being the first state with multiple tournament classifications, Michigan’s attention to trends and shifts in philosophy aimed at fair play and equal tournament opportunity can be traced from 80 years ago to the present.
In the earliest years of the MHSAA, there were four classifications for elections and tournaments – Classes A, B, C and D. Classes C and D had far more schools than Classes A and B. For example, 80 years ago (1937), there were only 58 schools in Class A, 94 schools in Class B, 297 schools in Class C and 253 schools in Class D.
Gradually through the years, as Michigan’s major cities spawned suburbs, there was a shift in the other direction to the point 30 years ago (1987) when school size became more balanced: 173 Class A schools, 178 Class B schools, 179 Class C schools and 182 Class D schools.
Up until 1987, the MHSAA published the dividing line between each classification, after which schools submitted their enrollments. Then, for 1988 and thereafter, the MHSAA adopted the plan of gathering all enrollments first and then placing 25 percent of the schools in each of four classes. This completed the equalization of the number of schools in each class for elections.
However, the change for 1988 did nothing to equalize the number of teams actually entered by each class in each sport. And unlike the early years of the Association when there were many more Class C and D teams than A and B teams, there were more Class A and B teams than C and D teams entering MHSAA tournaments decades later.
Moreover, the difference in number of teams entered in the different classifications for a sport continued to increase as many small schools, the fastest growing portion of the MHSAA's membership, sponsor only a few sports, or they sponsor no sports at all but enter into cooperative programs with other schools.
Because of these differences, Class A or B schools sometimes had to win twice as many games as Class C or D schools to reach the MHSAA Finals in a sport. At times, the larger classifications had District Tournaments, even rat-tail games, and/or a Quarterfinal game, and the smaller classifications did not. Most Class D Districts have had four teams (some only three), while Class A Districts often had seven or eight teams. In Regional levels of individual sports, the number of entries in the larger classification once greatly outnumbered those in the smaller classifications of the tournament for the same sport.
Over the years, these dividing lines between classes escalated gradually, as did the differences in enrollments of largest and small schools in each class. In 1937 the dividing lines were 700, 300 and 100 between Class A and B, B and C, and C and D, respectively. By 1987, the dividing lines were 1,129, 571 and 298, respectively, leading to the current method of collecting enrollments and then setting the classification.
With the pendulum swinging well past center by the late 1980s, coaches associations, MHSAA sport committees, tournament managers and school administrators began discussion and offered proposals to correct what many believed had become a flawed system of MHSAA tournament classification.
At the 1996 MHSAA Update Meetings, ¾ of 858 respondents to that year’s annual survey indicated they favored a system that would divide schools which actually sponsor each sport into two, three or four nearly equal divisions.
Problem solving
At its meeting May 4-6, 1997, the Representative Council defeated a motion that would have adopted in one action a coordinated plan of reclassification for all sports to equalize the number of schools in each tournament for each respective sport. Instead, the Council discussed and voted on each proposal that had been presented from sport committees.
This resulted in the Representative Council adopting four equal divisions for baseball and softball, four equal divisions for boys and girls tennis, four equal divisions for boys soccer and three equal divisions for girls soccer, effective with the 1997-98 school year. Helping in the decision was the success of the 1995-96 MHSAA Wrestling season, which saw the sport move to four divisions for its tournament structure
The Council delayed action on similar proposals for football and boys golf at that time to glean additional input. The same decision was made with respect to a proposal from the Ice Hockey Committee that would have split the Class A schools in two divisions and left the Class B/C/D Tournament unchanged.
“The gist of the move from classes to divisions was to equalize the path to championships for students of all schools, regardless of the size of those schools,” said MHSAA Executive Director Jack Roberts.
While the restructuring accomplished that goal for the majority of competitors, opposition exists now as it did then. The primary argument in opposition to the changes is that, in some sports, it increases the range between largest and smallest schools in the division for smallest schools, even as the range is usually reduced for other divisions.
Larger schools offered a counterpoint.
“The larger schools suggested that while they may have more students, they also attempt to sponsor more sports than the smaller schools, in some cases spreading the enrollment as thin as a much smaller school with fewer sports,” Roberts said.
“Even today, the idea of four equal divisions can be unpopular among some Class D schools which feel especially burdened by the equal division concept,” Roberts said. “There was enough opposition in 1997 that equal divisions were rejected for boys and girls basketball and girls volleyball, and some of that opposition remains.”
The numbers of schools sponsoring each MHSAA tournament are still close to the totals today, with the exception of soccer in both genders, which has enjoyed substantial increases. This spring, 466 girls teams were scheduled to compete in the MHSAA Soccer Tournament, while 473 boys teams will suit up this fall.
Since the beginning of MHSAA divisions in 1996 with wrestling, 147 additional team champions have been crowned and countless individuals have known the thrill of victory due to an extra level of Finals in various sports. Girls soccer has seen the most growth in opportunity, moving from two classes in 1987 to three divisions the following year, and then four divisions in 2000. Boys soccer had enjoyed four classes for two years prior to the new four-division format, and it was the sport of soccer that helped to create a caveat in the nearly equal division movement.
Lower Peninsula boys and girls swimming & diving expanded from two to three divisions in 2008, while boys and girls bowling are the most recent sports to enjoy increased tournament opportunity, adding a fourth division in 2010.
“Fairness is in the eye of the beholder. While having the same number of schools in each division is one kind of fairness, holding in check the enrollment range between the largest and smallest schools in Division 4 is another kind of fairness that is dear to a great number of people,” Roberts said. “Because more schools sponsor basketball and volleyball than other sports, Class D schools would have been least affected by the equal divisions concept in those sports; but that, and ‘tradition,’ did not dissuade the opponents in the 1990s.”
The shift to divisions not only paved the way for student-athletes, but also assisted administrators and schools hosting tournaments. MHSAA tournament mangers looked to equal divisions to more closely equalize the number of schools in District or Regional Tournaments and to better equalize the length of day required for these rounds of tournaments, both for management and participating teams and individuals.
Pinning down an answer
Wrestling became the first MHSAA Tournament to be conducted in nearly equal divisions when team and individual champions were crowned in Divisions 1, 2, 3 and 4 rather than Classes A, B, C/D for the 1996 winter championships.
The movement was well received, as schools saw more opportunity for success: four champions where there once were three at the District, Regional and Final levels, and a smaller range of enrollment between the smallest and largest school in all four tournaments, leading to the impetus for the Fall 1996 Update Meeting Survey of schools regarding similar movement in other sports.
Team champions that year were Holt (D1), Petoskey (D2), Middleville Thornapple Kellogg (D3) and Dundee (D4).
Getting their kicks
When the "equal divisions" concept was approved by the Representative Council for most MHSAA Tournaments for the 1997-98 school year, there was opposition from the smallest schools which, under the equal divisions, are forced to play against larger schools than reside in Class D. Compelling arguments were made – and still are – that an enrollment difference between schools with smaller enrollments (e.g., Class D) is more difficult to overcome in athletic competition than an even larger enrollment difference between schools with larger enrollments (e.g., Class A).
The opposition was most intense in soccer because of the number of students needed to field a team and the physical nature of the sport. As a result, from 2000-01 through 2010-11, soccer operated with a “20-percent modification.” This placed 20 percent of all schools that actually sponsored soccer in Division 4, and the remaining 80 percent were placed equally in Divisions 1, 2 and 3.
At the time the 20 percent modification was adopted, it was also established that soccer would return to four equal divisions when the largest Division 4 soccer school had an enrollment equal to or smaller than the mid point for Class C schools. That occurred in 2010.
Last class on the schedule
In the same volume of “history being the best teacher,” one can also find the adage, “times change.” While the division format was a welcome change in some sports, others were left to hold class without change.
In the sports of boys and girls basketball, and girls volleyball, the number of schools sponsoring the sports were so close to the overall membership of the MHSAA that divisions were not necessary; the enrollment breakdowns themselves were enough to delineate equal opportunity for tournament success.
That is no longer the case, according to MHSAA membership. The last move from classes to divisions occurred for the 2006-07 school year following Council action. Before this May, that is. Action at the most recent Representative Council meeting, May 2017, called for the shift to divisions for MHSAA Boys and Girls Basketball, and Girls Volleyball, beginning with the 2018-19 season.
“Because the MHSAA Volleyball Committee had requested this change several times a number of years ago, and because the Council felt the change inevitable, there should not be further delay,” Roberts said. “It is an important detail that the Class D maximum has dropped 50 students over the past decade so the objection that much larger schools would be competing in Division 4 isn’t very strong now.”
Using the 2017-18 enrollment figures, just eight Class C schools would be competing in Division 4 for boys basketball, 11 for girls basketball and 14 for girls volleyball.
Good things came of the previous most-recent switches in 2006-07. Competitive Cheer was re-classified from Class A, B and C-D into four equal divisions assisting in the rapid growth of sponsoring schools (approximately 80 schools per division). Alpine skiing was changed from Class A and B-C D to two equal divisions.
At that time, the MHSAA Basketball Committee had recommended to the Council the study of increased classifications, but status quo remained.
Back on the grid
As such, MHSAA Basketball and Volleyball remained the only holdovers of the MHSAA class structure. Discussion resurfaced periodically during the last two decades to bring those tournaments in line with the other MHSAA sports.
Regular-season football-playing schools are separated by class, then are reshuffled by divisions for the playoffs. Football, as we know, underwent a significant postseason facelift in the late 1990s.
While MHSAA Football also remained a class sport through 1998, it had expanded from four to eight classes from 1990-98, becoming the first MHSAA sport to crown more than four team champions. Member schools were asked to consider a pair of options in November of 1997. One called for eight equal divisions, and the second would leave Class D by itself as division 8, and split Class A, B and C schools into seven nearly equal divisions.
After much discussion, retooling, and crunching of formulas, the MHSAA unveiled its revised Football Playoff model that continues to roll today, nearly 20 years later. It was determined that 256 teams would qualify for the tournament based first on a minimum of six wins, then by Playoff Points determined by formula. From there, the field would be divided into eight divisions, with the field being filled out by a nearly equal number of five-win teams in each division as needed to reach 256.
Eight championships would indeed be enough, until football sponsorship among the MHSAA’s smallest schools – some with rich football traditions – began to trend downward. The MHSAA again went to the drawing board, examining the viability of 8-player football. After an experimental year in 2010 without a tournament, the 8-player game was playoff-ready for 2011, with a field of 16 qualifiers embarking on a four-week tournament.
Not only did the 8-player option restore recently canceled programs, but it also created teams in schools which previously had none, and convinced some 11-player schools that this new division was the best path to take.
What did this do for the Class D holdovers staying in the traditional 11-player game? Well, a couple of things, positive and negative. As two and three dozen Class D schools opted for the 8-player game, the remaining 11-player Class D schools at times found themselves in disrupted leagues and had to travel further to complete schedules. They also competed against larger teams in Division 8 of the 11-player MHSAA Football Playoffs.
However, the growth of the 8-player game among the smallest schools also resulted in more Class D schools qualifying for the MHSAA Football Playoffs than ever before. In 2012, an all-time high 44 percent of Class D schools sponsoring football qualified for either the 8-player tournament or Division 8 of the 11-player tournament. That compared to 42.2 percent of Class C schools, 44.9 percent of Class B schools and 41.6 percent of Class A schools which qualified for the 2012 playoffs.
Much is to be determined in the most recent chapter of MHSAA Tournament expansion as the 8-Player Football Playoffs welcome a second division. As the past illustrates, there will be pluses and minuses. History also shows that the MHSAA has received maximum input from its constituents, researched all possibilities, and will find solutions to questions still in the balance before an additional group of athletes hoists a new trophy in November.
Through the Years
A chronology of when which sports moved from Class to Division in the MHSAA.
1995-96: LP Wrestling
1997-98: Baseball, Boys Soccer, Girls Soccer, Softball, LP Girls Tennis, LP Boys Tennis
1998-99: LP Boys Golf, LP Girls Golf
1999-2000: Ice Hockey, LP Boys Track & Field, LP Girls Track & Field
2000-01: LP Boys Cross Country, LP Girls Cross Country, UP Boys Cross Country, UP Girls Cross Country, UP Boys Golf, UP Girls Golf, UP Boys Tennis, UP Girls Tennis, UP Boys Track & Field, UP Girls Track & Field
2002-03: LP Girls Swimming & Diving, LP Boys Swimming & Diving
2005-06: Boys Bowling, Girls Bowling
2006-07: Girls Competitive Cheer, Boys Skiing, Girls Skiing
2018-19: Boys Basketball, Girls Basketball, Girls Volleyball
Note: Boys and Girls Lacrosse has been a divisional sport since it began in during the 2004-05 school year.
Preview: 315 Bowling Teams Primed to Pursue Team, Singles Championships
By
Geoff Kimmerly
MHSAA.com senior editor
February 27, 2025
A total of 149 girls and 166 boys bowling teams will be represented across four divisions and two days of MHSAA Bowling Finals this weekend.
Several have won before. A handful had winners just last season. Many more have an opportunity to take home a trophy or celebrate an individual champion for the first time.
Below is a look at possible contenders for all 16 championships, team and singles. Action begins both days at 8:25 a.m. – teams competing Friday and singles Saturday – with Division 1 at Allen Park’s Thunderbowl Lanes, Division 2 at Waterford's Century Bowl, Division 3 at Jackson’s Jax 60 and Division 4 at Muskegon’s Northway Lanes. Find the full list of qualifiers and come back all weekend for coverage from all four Finals sites on MHSAA.com.
Girls Division 1
Team: Reigning champion Zeeland did not qualify this time, but West Michigan again boasts an intriguing contender with Rockford posting a division-best 3,383 to win the Regional at Sherman Bowling Center in Muskegon. Utica United is ranked No. 1 and also broke 3,100 pins to win at Five Star Lanes in Sterling Heights – and qualify three bowlers for singles competition as well. Grand Blanc (3,260) and Ypsilanti Lincoln (3,201) both broke 3,000 pins in Regional victories, and 2024 Finals runner-up South Lyon was close at 2,987. South Lyon is ranked No. 2 and Grand Blanc No. 3.
Singles: Last season’s champion will not return, but 2023 champion Katherine Stephens from Clarkston will be back after finishing second at Century Bowl at Waterford to Novi senior Madeline Gazzarari at their Regional last week. Stephens, also a senior, did not make the field last year, and Gazzarari missed match play but was a semifinalist in 2023. Utica United sophomore Ava Mazza made the semifinals last season and has qualified for this weekend, as have Holt senior Madison Rue, Macomb L’Anse Creuse North sophomore Lauren Zalenski, Livonia Franklin senior Brooklyn Hannah, Belleville senior Amber Spicer, Utica United senior Sophia Matheson and Rockford sophomore Sofia DeLuccia from the 2024 match play bracket. Grand Haven senior Jenna McKinzie, Caledonia junior Addison Luxford, Flushing senior Lily Jurvelin, Utica United senior Hadley Clark and Southfield Arts & Technology junior Jaysa Taylor joined Gazzarari, Hannah and Spicer as Regional champions.
Boys Division 1
Team: Grandville is the reigning champion, ranked No. 1, and won its Regional last week at Sherman Bowling Center by 10 pins. Davison, last season’s Finals runner-up, rolled a division-best 3,732 to win at Grand Blanc Lanes, and Plymouth had the second-highest total in Division 1 of 3,686 to win at Super Bowl Lanes in Canton. Davison is ranked No. 2 and has finished Finals runner-up twice. No. 6 Oxford and No. 9 Jenison also were among overall high scorers last week, as was Belleville.
Singles: Utica United senior Dylan Hamden jumped from the quarterfinals as a sophomore to champion last season, and will bowl for a repeat. Davison senior Joe Merz won his Regional last week and made the semifinals last year, and Grandville senior Bonham Pulcifer and Hudsonville senior Ferris Eldred are returning quarterfinalists. Utica United senior Kingston Corpuz, Portage Central senior Matt Sprau and Macomb Dakota junior Cole Ragus also made the match play a year ago and will bowl this weekend. Rogus joins Merz coming off a Regional title, as does Wyandotte Roosevelt senior Peyton Webster, Northville junior Drew Bandilla, Zeeland West senior Noah VanderVelde, Hartland senior Haden Hebel, Muskegon Mona Shores senior Derek Kern and Troy senior Jacob Kondratyev.
Girls Division 2
Team: Flint Kearsley took back the title last season, the Hornets’ third over the last four years and ninth over the last 11. They are ranked No. 2 and rolled a division second-best 3,308 to win their Regional last week at Richfield Bowl in Flint. The top Regional score in Division 2 belonged to Bay City John Glenn, last season’s Finals runner-up. The Bobcats rolled a 3,311 to win by 370 pins at Gaylord Bowling Center. No. 7 Three Rivers posted a similar victory at Kalamazoo’s Continental Lanes, rolling a 3,208 to win by 412 pins. Top-ranked Swartz Creek was second to Kearsley at Richfield Bowl, 145 pins back, and No. 4 Tecumseh edged No. 5 Mason by six pins to win at Ten Pin Alley. John Glenn has finished Finals runner-up seven times since winning the first Class B title in 2004.
Singles: Reigning champion Caitlyn Johnson finished second at her Regional at B’s Bowling Center in Flint last week to book a return to this weekend, and her semifinal opponent from last season Olivia Demick from New Boston Huron also will be back. Both are seniors. Charlotte senior Lori Jackson, John Glenn senior Caeli Schultz and Jackson Northwest sophomore Casey Jahr are back after making the 2024 quarterfinals, and Sparta senior Kylee Dines and Cedar Springs junior Phoebe Fisk also are back from the match play bracket. Schultz and Dines won Regional titles last week, along with Ada Forest Hills Eastern senior Emilee Nowicki, Three Rivers sophomore Jayna Larson, Trenton senior Hannah Feijoo, Warren Woods Tower senior Kasie Golema, Kearsley sophomore Olivia Hurst and Pinckney freshman Danielle Martyka. Larson and senior teammate Tayler Mohney (who also qualified for this weekend) reached Finals match play in Division 3 last season.
Boys Division 2
Team: Flint Kearsley has won the last two Division 2 titles and also is ranked No. 1 and coming off a Regional championship after throwing a 3,558 at Richfield Bowl. Only two other Division 2 teams broke 3,500 pins last week – No. 9 Swartz Creek to finish 45 pins back of Kearsley, and No. 3 Bay City Westen to win by 416 pins at Gaylord Bowling Center. No. 2 New Boston Huron was another Regional champion, at Westland Bowl, as was No. 5 Mason by 28 pins ahead of No. 7 Tecumseh at Ten Pin Alley.
Singles: Kearsley junior Jameson Vanier earned an opportunity to repeat as champion with a third-place Regional finish, and Tecumseh senior Palmer Ziemer is back after making the semifinals last year. Madison Heights Lamphere senior Nicholas Weidenbach won his Regional last week and was a quarterfinalist last winter, and Bay City John Glenn senior Nathan Gwizdala, Mason senior Daniel Barth, Bay City Western junior Aiden Archuleta, Sparta senior Josiah Reister and Carleton Airport sophomore Brayden Siders are back after making the 2024 match play. Siders, Reister and Archuleta also were Regional champs last week, joined by Tecumseh senior Ryan Knight, Lowell senior Caden Witten, Kearsley junior Nathan Richardson and Sturgis junior Andrew Matz.
Girls Division 3
Team: Reigning champion Madison Heights Bishop Foley didn’t qualify for this Finals weekend, but 2024 runner-up Milan did finishing 23 pins behind Adrian Madison at Station 300 in Saline. Top-ranked Livonia Clarenceville also was a Regional champion, by 373 pins at B’s Bowling Center, as was No. 4 Armada by 206 pins at Strikers Entertainment in Richmond. No. 5 Grass Lake was first at Royal Scot in Lansing, with No. 2 Michigan Center second to advance as well. Clarenceville’s 2,912 was the division high.
Singles: All four semifinalists from last season graduated, but Bishop Foley junior Jacey Thibodeau, Milan junior Maggie Smith and Dundee junior Abigail DeBruyne are back from the quarterfinals – Thibodeau and Smith after winning Regional titles and DeBruyne as the runner-up to Smith last week. Hillsdale senior Shalee Van Heerde and Armada junior Reese Cecil also qualified again after making the match play last winter, Van Heerde by winning her Regional. Other Regional champs were Boyne City senior Lauren LaBute, Central Montcalm freshman Savana Pearson, Coloma senior Maddy Hamilton, Armada junior Maggie Fradle and Pinconning senior Layla St. Peter.
Boys Division 3
Team: Frankenmuth swept team and singles championships in 2024, and the Eagles will return after finishing second to Midland Bullock Creek at Northern Lanes in Sanford last week. Bullock Creek’s 3,488 was the third-highest score in all of Division 3 in Regional competition, following No. 5 Blissfield’s winning 3,591 at Station 300 and No. 4 Hopkins’ 3,522 at Park Center Lanes in Wyoming. No. 2 Milan – last season’s Finals runner-up – was Regional runner-up to Blissfield. Top-ranked Croswell-Lexington qualified as a Regional runner-up behind league rival Almont and ahead of another league rival in No. 3 Armada, which did not advance.
Singles: Gladstone senior Matt Meyer fell 30 pins shy in last season’s championship match, but he’ll attempt another run and coming off a Regional title this time. Croswell-Lexington sophomore Joshua Gunderson and Milan senior Max Jenness are returning quarterfinalists and won Regionals last week as well, and senior Dom Danneffel also will return after reaching the quarterfinals in 2024. Frankenmuth senior Liam Liddle and Almont senior Hunter Ross will return after reaching the Finals match play. Also winning Regional titles last week were Napoleon senior Ethan Ross, Wyoming Kelloggsville junior Donovan Hernandez-Henning, Central Montcalm senior Paytin Pearson, Livonia Clarenceville junior Sam Wiacek and Bullock Creek senior Cole Gilbert.
Girls Division 4
Team: Another new champion is guaranteed in this division as reigning champion Traverse City Christian – and runner-up Bronson – did not qualify. In fact, a first-time champion is very likely – of the 16 teams competing this weekend, only Sandusky has won a Finals team title before, most recently in 2012. Ravenna was the only Regional champion last week to break 3,000 pins, with 3,002 to win by 340 at Sherman Lanes. Top-ranked Jonesville, No. 4 Bad Axe and No. 6 Burton Atherton also were among Regional champions.
Singles: Bad Axe junior Jasmyn Ranquist is seeking to repeat and won her Regional last week by 322 pins with a 1,363 at Monitor Lanes in Bay City. Memphis senior Lauren Castillo also will be back after finishing Finals runner-up a year ago, as will 2024 semifinalists MacKenzey Forster from Atherton and Kourtney Downham from Allen Park Cabrini. They are a senior and junior, respectively. Atherton senior Reagan Baker won her Regional last week and is back from last year’s quarterfinals, and Hudson junior Ellie Loar, Bronson senior Morgan McConn and Ravenna sophomore Taylor Nutt are back after making match play – McConn and Nutt as two more Regional champs last week. Mancelona sophomore Hailey Kauffman, Addison senior Molly Brown, Taylor Trillium Academy senior Sara Brunell and Ithaca senior Isabel Guild also were Regional title winners.
Boys Division 4
Team: Reigning champion Traverse City Christian did not qualify, but last season’s runner-up and current No. 2 Jonesville won its Regional at M-66 Bowl in Battle Creek and will pursue its first championship since winning Division 3 in 2018. Jonesville’s 3,367 also was the highest Regional score in all of Division 4, and Jackson Lumen Christi fell only a pin shy of 3,000 in winning its Regional at Jax 60 in Jackson. No. 3 Ravenna and No. 9 Bronson were the only other ranked teams to advance, both finishing as Regional runners-up.
Singles: Two past champions will compete this weekend, as Hudson junior Carter Fournier is returning after winning last year’s title and 2023 champ Alex McCarthy is back as a senior at Saginaw Nouvel Catholic Central. Returning as well is last season’s runner-up, Allen Park Cabrini senior Bryce Cadaret, and Jonesville senior Andrew Sackett after reaching the semifinals in 2024. Detroit Loyola junior Cody Champion, Traverse City Christian senior Ethan Ehlert, Lumen Christi senior Zachary Kremer and Burton Atherton junior Brennen Eaton also are back after making the match play. Oscoda senior Josh McDonald, Grandville Calvin Christian senior Brandon Tavera, Burr Oak senior Jacob Trennepohl, Vandercook Lake freshman Bruer Gieske, New Haven senior Nathan Patton and Ithaca senior Broden Peska were joined by McCarthy and Eaton as Regional champions last week.
PHOTO Westland John Glenn's Tiara Henderson was an individual Regional runner-up in Division 1 and also helped her team finish second and qualify for this weekend's Finals. (Photo courtesy of the Westland John Glenn athletic department.)