Class in Session: A History in Classification
July 24, 2017
By Rob Kaminski
MHSAA benchmarks editor
This is the first part in a series on MHSAA tournament classification, past and present, that will be published over the next two weeks. This series originally ran in this spring's edition of MHSAA benchmarks.
Conversation and discussion at the March 2017 MHSAA Representative Council Meeting leaned heavily toward the subject of 8-Player Football and how to properly balance its tournament with the growing number of schools sponsoring the sport.
While the proposal to split the tournament into two divisions beginning with the 2017 school year was adopted, the MHSAA then faced questions such as when to set the divisions, how to determine qualifiers and where to host the championship games.
The topic continues to create a buzz in Class D schools across both peninsulas, and likely will do into the start of school this fall.
Likewise, the lone holdouts still conducting tournaments by class – MHSAA Boys and Girls Basketball and Girls Volleyball – took center stage at the May Council discussion, and following the 2017-18 school year, class is out for good. Both genders of basketball, and girls volleyball, will move to divisional formats thereafter.
There is much to be decided to be sure; but as those in education are well aware, history is the best teacher.
Fortunately for the sports in flux and for all sports under the governance of the MHSAA, the Association more or less wrote the book on the subject of sport classification. Following is a history lesson, with a little advanced division thrown in.
Class structure
Credited with being the first state with multiple tournament classifications, Michigan’s attention to trends and shifts in philosophy aimed at fair play and equal tournament opportunity can be traced from 80 years ago to the present.
In the earliest years of the MHSAA, there were four classifications for elections and tournaments – Classes A, B, C and D. Classes C and D had far more schools than Classes A and B. For example, 80 years ago (1937), there were only 58 schools in Class A, 94 schools in Class B, 297 schools in Class C and 253 schools in Class D.
Gradually through the years, as Michigan’s major cities spawned suburbs, there was a shift in the other direction to the point 30 years ago (1987) when school size became more balanced: 173 Class A schools, 178 Class B schools, 179 Class C schools and 182 Class D schools.
Up until 1987, the MHSAA published the dividing line between each classification, after which schools submitted their enrollments. Then, for 1988 and thereafter, the MHSAA adopted the plan of gathering all enrollments first and then placing 25 percent of the schools in each of four classes. This completed the equalization of the number of schools in each class for elections.
However, the change for 1988 did nothing to equalize the number of teams actually entered by each class in each sport. And unlike the early years of the Association when there were many more Class C and D teams than A and B teams, there were more Class A and B teams than C and D teams entering MHSAA tournaments decades later.
Moreover, the difference in number of teams entered in the different classifications for a sport continued to increase as many small schools, the fastest growing portion of the MHSAA's membership, sponsor only a few sports, or they sponsor no sports at all but enter into cooperative programs with other schools.
Because of these differences, Class A or B schools sometimes had to win twice as many games as Class C or D schools to reach the MHSAA Finals in a sport. At times, the larger classifications had District Tournaments, even rat-tail games, and/or a Quarterfinal game, and the smaller classifications did not. Most Class D Districts have had four teams (some only three), while Class A Districts often had seven or eight teams. In Regional levels of individual sports, the number of entries in the larger classification once greatly outnumbered those in the smaller classifications of the tournament for the same sport.
Over the years, these dividing lines between classes escalated gradually, as did the differences in enrollments of largest and small schools in each class. In 1937 the dividing lines were 700, 300 and 100 between Class A and B, B and C, and C and D, respectively. By 1987, the dividing lines were 1,129, 571 and 298, respectively, leading to the current method of collecting enrollments and then setting the classification.
With the pendulum swinging well past center by the late 1980s, coaches associations, MHSAA sport committees, tournament managers and school administrators began discussion and offered proposals to correct what many believed had become a flawed system of MHSAA tournament classification.
At the 1996 MHSAA Update Meetings, ¾ of 858 respondents to that year’s annual survey indicated they favored a system that would divide schools which actually sponsor each sport into two, three or four nearly equal divisions.
Problem solving
At its meeting May 4-6, 1997, the Representative Council defeated a motion that would have adopted in one action a coordinated plan of reclassification for all sports to equalize the number of schools in each tournament for each respective sport. Instead, the Council discussed and voted on each proposal that had been presented from sport committees.
This resulted in the Representative Council adopting four equal divisions for baseball and softball, four equal divisions for boys and girls tennis, four equal divisions for boys soccer and three equal divisions for girls soccer, effective with the 1997-98 school year. Helping in the decision was the success of the 1995-96 MHSAA Wrestling season, which saw the sport move to four divisions for its tournament structure
The Council delayed action on similar proposals for football and boys golf at that time to glean additional input. The same decision was made with respect to a proposal from the Ice Hockey Committee that would have split the Class A schools in two divisions and left the Class B/C/D Tournament unchanged.
“The gist of the move from classes to divisions was to equalize the path to championships for students of all schools, regardless of the size of those schools,” said MHSAA Executive Director Jack Roberts.
While the restructuring accomplished that goal for the majority of competitors, opposition exists now as it did then. The primary argument in opposition to the changes is that, in some sports, it increases the range between largest and smallest schools in the division for smallest schools, even as the range is usually reduced for other divisions.
Larger schools offered a counterpoint.
“The larger schools suggested that while they may have more students, they also attempt to sponsor more sports than the smaller schools, in some cases spreading the enrollment as thin as a much smaller school with fewer sports,” Roberts said.
“Even today, the idea of four equal divisions can be unpopular among some Class D schools which feel especially burdened by the equal division concept,” Roberts said. “There was enough opposition in 1997 that equal divisions were rejected for boys and girls basketball and girls volleyball, and some of that opposition remains.”
The numbers of schools sponsoring each MHSAA tournament are still close to the totals today, with the exception of soccer in both genders, which has enjoyed substantial increases. This spring, 466 girls teams were scheduled to compete in the MHSAA Soccer Tournament, while 473 boys teams will suit up this fall.
Since the beginning of MHSAA divisions in 1996 with wrestling, 147 additional team champions have been crowned and countless individuals have known the thrill of victory due to an extra level of Finals in various sports. Girls soccer has seen the most growth in opportunity, moving from two classes in 1987 to three divisions the following year, and then four divisions in 2000. Boys soccer had enjoyed four classes for two years prior to the new four-division format, and it was the sport of soccer that helped to create a caveat in the nearly equal division movement.
Lower Peninsula boys and girls swimming & diving expanded from two to three divisions in 2008, while boys and girls bowling are the most recent sports to enjoy increased tournament opportunity, adding a fourth division in 2010.
“Fairness is in the eye of the beholder. While having the same number of schools in each division is one kind of fairness, holding in check the enrollment range between the largest and smallest schools in Division 4 is another kind of fairness that is dear to a great number of people,” Roberts said. “Because more schools sponsor basketball and volleyball than other sports, Class D schools would have been least affected by the equal divisions concept in those sports; but that, and ‘tradition,’ did not dissuade the opponents in the 1990s.”
The shift to divisions not only paved the way for student-athletes, but also assisted administrators and schools hosting tournaments. MHSAA tournament mangers looked to equal divisions to more closely equalize the number of schools in District or Regional Tournaments and to better equalize the length of day required for these rounds of tournaments, both for management and participating teams and individuals.
Pinning down an answer
Wrestling became the first MHSAA Tournament to be conducted in nearly equal divisions when team and individual champions were crowned in Divisions 1, 2, 3 and 4 rather than Classes A, B, C/D for the 1996 winter championships.
The movement was well received, as schools saw more opportunity for success: four champions where there once were three at the District, Regional and Final levels, and a smaller range of enrollment between the smallest and largest school in all four tournaments, leading to the impetus for the Fall 1996 Update Meeting Survey of schools regarding similar movement in other sports.
Team champions that year were Holt (D1), Petoskey (D2), Middleville Thornapple Kellogg (D3) and Dundee (D4).
Getting their kicks
When the "equal divisions" concept was approved by the Representative Council for most MHSAA Tournaments for the 1997-98 school year, there was opposition from the smallest schools which, under the equal divisions, are forced to play against larger schools than reside in Class D. Compelling arguments were made – and still are – that an enrollment difference between schools with smaller enrollments (e.g., Class D) is more difficult to overcome in athletic competition than an even larger enrollment difference between schools with larger enrollments (e.g., Class A).
The opposition was most intense in soccer because of the number of students needed to field a team and the physical nature of the sport. As a result, from 2000-01 through 2010-11, soccer operated with a “20-percent modification.” This placed 20 percent of all schools that actually sponsored soccer in Division 4, and the remaining 80 percent were placed equally in Divisions 1, 2 and 3.
At the time the 20 percent modification was adopted, it was also established that soccer would return to four equal divisions when the largest Division 4 soccer school had an enrollment equal to or smaller than the mid point for Class C schools. That occurred in 2010.
Last class on the schedule
In the same volume of “history being the best teacher,” one can also find the adage, “times change.” While the division format was a welcome change in some sports, others were left to hold class without change.
In the sports of boys and girls basketball, and girls volleyball, the number of schools sponsoring the sports were so close to the overall membership of the MHSAA that divisions were not necessary; the enrollment breakdowns themselves were enough to delineate equal opportunity for tournament success.
That is no longer the case, according to MHSAA membership. The last move from classes to divisions occurred for the 2006-07 school year following Council action. Before this May, that is. Action at the most recent Representative Council meeting, May 2017, called for the shift to divisions for MHSAA Boys and Girls Basketball, and Girls Volleyball, beginning with the 2018-19 season.
“Because the MHSAA Volleyball Committee had requested this change several times a number of years ago, and because the Council felt the change inevitable, there should not be further delay,” Roberts said. “It is an important detail that the Class D maximum has dropped 50 students over the past decade so the objection that much larger schools would be competing in Division 4 isn’t very strong now.”
Using the 2017-18 enrollment figures, just eight Class C schools would be competing in Division 4 for boys basketball, 11 for girls basketball and 14 for girls volleyball.
Good things came of the previous most-recent switches in 2006-07. Competitive Cheer was re-classified from Class A, B and C-D into four equal divisions assisting in the rapid growth of sponsoring schools (approximately 80 schools per division). Alpine skiing was changed from Class A and B-C D to two equal divisions.
At that time, the MHSAA Basketball Committee had recommended to the Council the study of increased classifications, but status quo remained.
Back on the grid
As such, MHSAA Basketball and Volleyball remained the only holdovers of the MHSAA class structure. Discussion resurfaced periodically during the last two decades to bring those tournaments in line with the other MHSAA sports.
Regular-season football-playing schools are separated by class, then are reshuffled by divisions for the playoffs. Football, as we know, underwent a significant postseason facelift in the late 1990s.
While MHSAA Football also remained a class sport through 1998, it had expanded from four to eight classes from 1990-98, becoming the first MHSAA sport to crown more than four team champions. Member schools were asked to consider a pair of options in November of 1997. One called for eight equal divisions, and the second would leave Class D by itself as division 8, and split Class A, B and C schools into seven nearly equal divisions.
After much discussion, retooling, and crunching of formulas, the MHSAA unveiled its revised Football Playoff model that continues to roll today, nearly 20 years later. It was determined that 256 teams would qualify for the tournament based first on a minimum of six wins, then by Playoff Points determined by formula. From there, the field would be divided into eight divisions, with the field being filled out by a nearly equal number of five-win teams in each division as needed to reach 256.
Eight championships would indeed be enough, until football sponsorship among the MHSAA’s smallest schools – some with rich football traditions – began to trend downward. The MHSAA again went to the drawing board, examining the viability of 8-player football. After an experimental year in 2010 without a tournament, the 8-player game was playoff-ready for 2011, with a field of 16 qualifiers embarking on a four-week tournament.
Not only did the 8-player option restore recently canceled programs, but it also created teams in schools which previously had none, and convinced some 11-player schools that this new division was the best path to take.
What did this do for the Class D holdovers staying in the traditional 11-player game? Well, a couple of things, positive and negative. As two and three dozen Class D schools opted for the 8-player game, the remaining 11-player Class D schools at times found themselves in disrupted leagues and had to travel further to complete schedules. They also competed against larger teams in Division 8 of the 11-player MHSAA Football Playoffs.
However, the growth of the 8-player game among the smallest schools also resulted in more Class D schools qualifying for the MHSAA Football Playoffs than ever before. In 2012, an all-time high 44 percent of Class D schools sponsoring football qualified for either the 8-player tournament or Division 8 of the 11-player tournament. That compared to 42.2 percent of Class C schools, 44.9 percent of Class B schools and 41.6 percent of Class A schools which qualified for the 2012 playoffs.
Much is to be determined in the most recent chapter of MHSAA Tournament expansion as the 8-Player Football Playoffs welcome a second division. As the past illustrates, there will be pluses and minuses. History also shows that the MHSAA has received maximum input from its constituents, researched all possibilities, and will find solutions to questions still in the balance before an additional group of athletes hoists a new trophy in November.
Through the Years
A chronology of when which sports moved from Class to Division in the MHSAA.
1995-96: LP Wrestling
1997-98: Baseball, Boys Soccer, Girls Soccer, Softball, LP Girls Tennis, LP Boys Tennis
1998-99: LP Boys Golf, LP Girls Golf
1999-2000: Ice Hockey, LP Boys Track & Field, LP Girls Track & Field
2000-01: LP Boys Cross Country, LP Girls Cross Country, UP Boys Cross Country, UP Girls Cross Country, UP Boys Golf, UP Girls Golf, UP Boys Tennis, UP Girls Tennis, UP Boys Track & Field, UP Girls Track & Field
2002-03: LP Girls Swimming & Diving, LP Boys Swimming & Diving
2005-06: Boys Bowling, Girls Bowling
2006-07: Girls Competitive Cheer, Boys Skiing, Girls Skiing
2018-19: Boys Basketball, Girls Basketball, Girls Volleyball
Note: Boys and Girls Lacrosse has been a divisional sport since it began in during the 2004-05 school year.
Preview: Rivalries Ready to Reignite, Historic Opportunities Await at CMU
By
Geoff Kimmerly
MHSAA.com senior editor
February 27, 2025
All of the rivalries that annually reignite at the MHSAA Competitive Cheer Finals are expected to do so again, with the Rochester schools battling in Division 1, Allen Park and Gibraltar Carlson among favorites in Division 2, and Pontiac Notre Dame Prep and Richmond back among the top-ranked in Division 3.
But several eyes will be watching the state’s smallest schools as they chase historic opportunities – amid perhaps the most wide-open race – in Division 4.
Hudson has won five straight Division 4 titles, and a sixth would tie the MHSAA record set by Carlson from 2011-16. But the Tigers are up against a high-scoring field that includes another of the all-time winningest champs in Pewamo-Westphalia and six teams all seeking their first title.
Among other Division 4 hopefuls are Coloma and Marion, both making their first Finals appearances, as is Zeeland West in Division 2.
Division 4 leads off the weekend at 2 p.m. Friday at Central Michigan University’s McGuirk Arena, followed by Division 1 at 6:30 p.m. Division 3 starts Saturday’s competitions at 11 a.m., with Division 2 finishing the weekend at 3:30 p.m. The full schedule, plus information on purchasing tickets and how to watch online are all available on the Competitive Cheer page of MHSAA.com.
Division 1
BRIGHTON
Ranking: No. 3
League finish: First in Kensington Lakes Activities Association West
Coach: Christine Wilson-Peacock, 13th season
Championship history: Class A runner-up 1999.
Top score: 788.80.
Team composition: 21 total (six seniors, six juniors, seven sophomores, two freshmen).
Outlook: Brighton finished sixth last season and fourth in 2023, and has finished first or second at all but one of its competitions this season with runner-up finishes at both its District and Regional. The Bulldogs have been remarkably consistent scoring between 787-788 points in four straight competitions and six of their last seven. Senior Kadyn Robertson earned all-Regional recognition last season, and senior Adrianna Pembroke earned all-state honorable mention in 2023.
GRANDVILLE
Ranking: No. 7
League finish: First in Ottawa-Kent Conference Red
Coach: Julie Smith-Boyd, 44th season
Championship history: Six MHSAA titles (most recent 2015), 10 runner-up finishes.
Top score: 789.08 at Regional.
Team composition: 24 (three seniors, eight juniors, six sophomores, seven freshmen).
Outlook: The Bulldogs graduated 17 from the team that finished eighth a year ago, but they haven’t slowed down. Grandville has finished first or second at all but two competitions this season and has won five straight and seven of its last eight. The Bulldogs are trending in the right direction on the scoresheet as well, posting their top two overall scores this season in claiming District and Regional titles. Juniors Maddy Denman, Olivia Talsma and Lauren Elder and senior Ava Wohlfert earned all-District recognition last season.
HARTLAND
Ranking: No. 5
League finish: Second in KLAA West
Coach: Candace Fahr, eighth season
Championship history: Division 1 runner-up 2013.
Top score: 790.46.
Team composition: 24 total (seven seniors, seven juniors, five sophomores, five freshmen).
Outlook: Hartland is back after finishing fourth at last year’s Final for the second time over the last three seasons. The Eagles finished first or second in all of their competitions this winter before placing third at their Regional, but their Regional score of 787.34 also was their third-highest this season after breaking 790 twice. Senior Makayla Prevo made the all-state first team last season, and senior Charleigh Ross made the second team.
MACOMB DAKOTA
Rank: No. 8
League finish: First in Macomb Area Conference Red
Coach: Michela Worthy, 23rd season
Championship history: Seeking first top-two MHSAA Finals finish.
Top score: 786.48 at Regional.
Team composition: 27 total (seven seniors, 11 juniors, five sophomores, four freshmen).
Outlook: Dakota is returning to the Finals for the first time since 2014, posting its top two scores this season in winning its District and then finishing fourth at its Regional. The Cougars followed at the Regional three of the top-four ranked teams in Division 1 and finished ahead of No. 6 Utica Eisenhower, No. 9 Macomb L’Anse Creuse North and No. 10 Wyandotte Roosevelt to qualify. Senior Ashley Pioch and sophomore Nicole Nehra earned all-District recognition in 2024.
ROCHESTER
Ranking: No. 1
League finish: First in Oakland Activities Association Red
Coach: Samantha Dean, third season
Championship history: 15 MHSAA titles (most recent 2023).
Top score: 793.68.
Team composition: 28 total (10 seniors, 10 juniors, eight sophomores).
Outlook: Rochester finished third last season, and a large group of juniors has become a sizable senior crew that has the Falcons arguably the favorites again. Rochester won all of its competitions before finishing second at its Regional and has scored at least 790 points in seven straight competitions. Seniors Natalia Grabovac and Isabella Gungab made the all-state second team last season, and senior Morgan Calcagno and junior Claire O’Neill earned honorable mentions. Senior Aubrey Hillard made the all-state second team in 2023.
ROCHESTER ADAMS
Ranking: No. 4
League finish: Third in OAA Red
Coach: Brooke Miller, 11th season
Championship history: Three MHSAA titles (most recent 2022), five runner-up finishes.
Top score: 792.76 at Regional.
Team composition: 26 total (six seniors, 13 juniors, five sophomores, two freshmen).
Outlook: Adams has finished Finals runner-up two straight seasons after winning three straight titles from 2020-22, and total the Highlanders have finished among the top two in seven consecutive Finals. They may be on the verge of extending that streak with their top two scores of the season – both surpassing 792 points – coming in finishing second at their District and third at their Regional. Senior Maria Caradonna and junior Nikala Hall made the all-state second team last season, and junior Libby Schultz and sophomore Gabriella Montgomery earned honorable mentions.
ROCHESTER HILLS STONEY CREEK
Ranking: No. 2
League finish: Second in OAA Red
Coach: Tricia Williams, 22nd season
Championship history: Three MHSAA titles (most recent 2024), Division 1 runner-up 2022.
Top score: 793.26 at Regional.
Team composition: 30 total (three seniors, 20 juniors, four sophomores, three freshmen).
Outlook: Reigning champion Stoney Creek made a loud statement at the Regional last week, becoming the only team to finish ahead of Rochester High in competition this winter. The Cougars have upped their top overall score this season in three straight competitions, breaking 792 twice before the Regional win by 38 hundredths of a point after posting the top-scoring routine in Round 3 to move ahead. Senior Sarah Adams made the all-state second team last season, and senior Sienna Wills and junior Natalie Marco earned honorable mentions.
ROCKFORD
Ranking: Unranked
League finish: Third in O-K Red
Coach: MeLisa Milanowski, fifth season
Championship history: Seeking first top-two Finals finish.
Top score: 780.64 at Regional.
Team composition: 23 total (10 seniors, five juniors, six sophomores, two freshmen).
Outlook: A team of nearly half seniors earned Rockford’s first trip to the Finals since 2006 and did so in dramatic fashion. The Rams finished fourth at their District with what was then a season-high score of 776.6, then buried that total by more than four points to earn the fourth-place Finals qualifying spot at the Regional. Sophomore Lila Gates earned all-District recognition last season.
Division 2
ALLEN PARK
Ranking: No. 1
League finish: First in Downriver League
Coach: Julie Goodwin, 21st season
Championship history: Six MHSAA titles (most recent 2024), five runner-up finishes.
Top score: 792.76 at District.
Team composition: 23 total (five seniors, three juniors, eight sophomores, seven freshmen).
Outlook: Allen Park has finished among the top two nine straight seasons and won four of the last five Division 2 titles. A roster of more than half underclassmen has achieved a near-perfect season, with only a second place in the Jaguars’ first competition followed by all firsts despite continuing their frequent matchups with similarly-powerful Gibraltar Carlson. Allen Park’s 785.78 at the Regional was more than seven points higher than the field. Senior Abigail Obrycki and junior Sophia Ramey made the all-state first team last season, and senior Peyton Will and sophomore Hazyl Hall earned honorable mentions.
CARLETON AIRPORT
Ranking: No. 6
League finish: First in Huron League
Coach: Emily Dusik, third season
Championship history: Division 2 runner-up 2024, Class B runner-up 2003.
Top score: 790.80.
Team composition: 23 total (two seniors, six juniors, 11 sophomores, four freshmen).
Outlook: Airport is coming off its best Finals finish in more than two decades and returns after emerging fourth from a Regional that included the top nine ranked teams in Division 2 – moving past No. 3 Fenton and No. 4 Southgate Anderson to claim the final qualifying spot. A third-highest Round 1 score at the Regional was especially impressive. Sophomore Isabella Mulvin and junior Sydney Linn made the all-state second team last season, and senior Ashleigh Bentley and junior Kadence McDonald earned honorable mentions.
CEDAR SPRINGS
Ranking: Unranked
League finish: First in River Cities Alliance
Coach: Katy Hradsky, fourth season
Championship history: Seeking first top-two Finals finish.
Top score: 750.86 at the Regional.
Team composition: 16 total (three seniors, four juniors, three sophomores, six freshmen).
Outlook: Cedar Springs returned to the Finals last season with a fifth-place finish and will attempt to build on that having posted their two highest scores this winter to win the District and finish third at the Regional – the latter with nearly a five-point jump. Junior Taylor Verduin made the all-state second team last season, and senior Sarah Buckley earned an honorable mention.
GIBRALTAR CARLSON
Ranking: No. 2
League finish: Second in Downriver League
Coach: Alyssa Tocco, fourth season
Championship history: 12 MHSAA titles (most recent 2023), seven runner-up finishes.
Top score: 795.26.
Team composition: 24 total (four seniors, three juniors, seven sophomores, 10 freshmen).
Outlook: Carlson has finished first or second at all of its competitions this season as it seeks to make another title push coming off last year’s fourth-place finish. The Marauders have scored fewer than 785 points only twice and broken 790 three times. Seniors Sofia Lanzini and Maranda Steinmetz made the all-state first team last season, while senior Haley Sanchez made the second team and senior Alaina Bucala earned an honorable mention.
MUSKEGON REETHS-PUFFER
Ranking: Unranked
League finish: Fourth in O-K Green
Coach: Lisabeth Smith, fourth season
Championship history: Seeking first top-two Finals finish.
Top score: N/A.
Team composition: 25 total (three seniors, 10 juniors, eight sophomores, four freshmen).
Outlook: Reeths-Puffer is returning to the Finals for the second-straight season and third time in Smith’s four leading the program. The Rockets improved on their District score by more than 16 points to earn the fourth-place qualifying spot for this weekend. Junior Madilynn Smith, senior Lorena Garcia and sophomore Malia McGuffey earned all-Regional recognition last season.
PLAINWELL
Ranking: No. 10
League finish: First in Wolverine Conference
Coach: Kylie Cook, sixth season
Championship history: Class B champion 2000, Class B runner-up 2001.
Top score: 767.68 at the Regional.
Team composition: 20 total (four seniors, nine juniors, two sophomores, five freshmen).
Outlook: Plainwell finished seventh last season at its first Final since 2003, and now the Trojans will return for the second-straight season coming off league, District and Regional titles and after posting their two highest scores this winter to win the latter two meets. They’ve won nine competitions, finished second twice and lower than that only once. Seniors Danika Sayles-Devine and Abigail Stewart and juniors Ella LaPenna, Mackenzie Meert and Alivia Meninga earned all-District recognition in 2024.
WALLED LAKE WESTERN
Ranking: No. 5
League finish: Second in Lakes Valley Conference
Co-coaches: Amber Stocks, 15th season; Michelle Frey, 13th season
Championship history: Seeking first top-two Finals finish.
Top score: 788.82.
Team composition: 21 total (six seniors, seven juniors, five sophomores, three freshmen).
Outlook: Western emerged third from the same loaded Regional as Airport filled with nine ranked teams, qualifying for the Finals for the first time since 2021and after missing by just one place a year ago. The Warriors also won their District this month with a score of 786.86. Seniors Emily Beaudoin and Zahylee Cox, junior Hannah Fore and sophomores Ella Spiess and Mariana Gonzalez earned all-Regional recognition last season.
ZEELAND WEST
Ranking: Unranked
League finish: First in O-K Black
Coach: Emillie Gort, third season
Championship history: Seeking first top-two Finals finish.
Top score: 761.36 at the District.
Team composition: 22 total (five seniors, four juniors, five sophomores, eight freshmen).
Outlook: West has earned its first trip to the Finals in this sport with runner-up finishes at its District and Regional, following its season-best score at the former with a 760.14 this past weekend to advance. The Dux have finished first or second at all of their competitions this season, including wins at all three league meets. West nearly reached the Finals a year ago, finishing fifth at its Regional, and seniors Riley Howe and Jordin Robelin and junior Addysen Miller earned all-Regional recognition.
Division 3
ARMADA
Ranking: No. 4
League finish: Second in Blue Water Area Conference
Coach: Deanna Misiak, ninth season
Championship history: Seeking first top-two Finals finish.
Top score: N/A.
Team composition: 24 total (five seniors, four juniors, three sophomores, 12 freshmen).
Outlook: Armada finished fourth last season in its first Finals trip since 2015, and returns this weekend coming off third-place finishes at its District and Regional against fields that included No. 1 Pontiac Notre Dame Prep and No. 2 Richmond – although the Tigers finished ahead of Richmond at the Regional. Armada scored an impressive 784.38 at the District and finished second in the BWAC as one of three top-10 teams in the league, including as well reigning two-time Finals champion Croswell-Lexington. Senior Alice Rhadigan made the all-state first team last season.
CHARLOTTE
Ranking: No. 9
League finish: First in Capital Area Activities Conference White
Coach: Jade Bowhall, second season
Championship history: Seeking first top-two Finals finish.
Top score: 760.44.
Team composition: 21 total (six seniors, five juniors, eight sophomores, two freshmen).
Outlook: Charlotte will make its first trip to the Finals since 2020 and has won or placed second at all but one competition this season – including a victory at its District and runner-up finish at its Regional. The Orioles have advanced to Regionals both seasons under Bowhall, and senior Brooke Tokar earned all-Regional recognition last season.
GLADSTONE
Ranking: Unranked
League finish: Does not compete in a conference.
Coach: Stacie Kitson, fourth season
Championship history: Seeking first top-two Finals finish.
Top score: 752.74
Team composition: 23 total (six seniors, three juniors, six sophomores, eight freshmen).
Outlook: Gladstone is making its first trip to the Finals since 2012, after taking third at both its District and Regional and finishing ahead of a ranked team at the latter. Kitson previously reached the Finals as both an athlete and assistant coach at Escanaba, as an athlete helping her school advance in 2016 for the first time. Senior Kristy Karl earned all-District recognition for Gladstone last season.
GROSSE ILE
Ranking: No. 3
League finish: Second in Huron League.
Coach: Angie Raithel, eighth season
Championship history: Two MHSAA titles (most recent 2010), Division 3 runner-up 2009.
Top score: 780.00.
Team composition: 23 total (seven seniors, two juniors, six sophomores, eight freshmen).
Outlook: After finishing third last season and only 1.18 points off the lead, Grosse Ile could make another serious title push. The Red Devils won a District that also included No. 6 Flat Rock and No. 10 Michigan Center and then finished second at a Regional just 2.64 points behind top-ranked Notre Dame Prep and ahead of five ranked teams including No. 2 Richmond. Senior Marissa Trombley and sophomore Laynie Gratz made the all-state first team last season, seniors Virginia West and Avelinn Flynn made the second team and senior Arianna Bianchi earned an honorable mention.
HOWARD CITY TRI COUNTY
Ranking: No. 5
League finish: First in Central State Activities Association
Coach: Jennifer Laskey, 21st season
Championship history: Seeking first top-two Finals finish.
Top score: N/A.
Team composition: 22 total (seven seniors, four juniors, two sophomores, nine freshmen).
Outlook: Tri County finished seventh last season and should bring plenty of momentum into this weekend coming off eight straight first-place finishes (and 11 in 12 competitions this season) including at its District and Regional. The Vikings won their Regional by nearly 27 points with a 760.06 – four points higher than their Finals score a year ago. Junior Briana Cheatham made the all-state first team last season, junior Jocelynn Olds made the second team and junior Violet Bellamy earned an honorable mention.
PONTIAC NOTRE DAME PREP
Ranking: No. 1
League finish: Does not compete in a conference.
Coach: Jocelyn Welsh, second season
Championship history: Five MHSAA titles (most recent 2018), five runner-up finishes.
Top score: 790.96 at the District.
Team composition: 28 total (seven seniors, six juniors, eight sophomores, seven freshmen).
Outlook: The Fighting Irish have finished Divisions 3 runners-up the last two seasons and four of the last six since completing a five-year title streak in 2018. They could start a new championship run this weekend having won all of their competitions so far this winter, including a Regional title against a fields that included No. 2 Richmond, No. 3 Grosse Ile and No. 4 Armada. Senior Grace Kinkade made the all-state first team last season, seniors Gabrielle Phillips and Paige Marlinga and junior Jenna Robin made the second team, and senior Lelia Mains and sophomore Eva Thomas earned honorable mentions.
PORTLAND
Ranking: Unranked
League finish: Third in CAAC White
Coach: Mindy Blaschka, 12th season
Championship history: Seeking first top-two Finals finish.
Top score: 730.96.
Team composition: 14 total (three seniors, four juniors, four sophomores, two freshmen).
Outlook: Portland improved to sixth place last season and will make its fourth-straight trip to the Finals after posting three of its top five overall scores of the season over the last three competitions. The Raiders have steadily improved their scores after graduating nine from last year’s team. Senior Karter Edwards earned all-Regional recognition last season.
RICHMOND
Ranking: No. 2
League finish: First in Blue Water Area Conference
Coach: Kelli Matthes, 17th season
Championship history: Six MHSAA titles (most recent 2022), five runner-up finishes.
Top score: 786.50 at the District.
Team composition: 27 total (four seniors, six juniors, seven sophomores, 10 freshmen).
Outlook: After a rare year away, Richmond is returning to the Finals and capable again of being in the championship mix with six scores over 770 points this winter. The Blue Devils have finished first or second at all of their competitions except the Regional, where they placed fourth among a field that included seven of the top 10 ranked teams. Seniors Faith Thompson and Autumn Rands, junior Ava Widmaier and sophomore Khloe Allison earned all-Regional honors in 2024.
Division 4
COLOMA
Ranking: No. 9
League finish: First in Southwestern Athletic Conference
Coach: Christin Smith, 16th season
Championship history: Seeking first top-two Finals finish.
Top score: 735.54 at the District.
Team composition: 18 total (five seniors, three juniors, six sophomores, four freshmen).
Outlook: Coloma’s run to its first Finals has included first or second places at all but one competition, including a District championship win by nearly 47 points. The Comets then placed fourth at their Regional against a field that included three more top-10 teams. Seniors Makenna Baryo, Olivia DeChant and Makenna Baker and junior Cassidy Emrath earned all-District honors last season.
GRAND RAPIDS NORTHPOINTE CHRISTIAN
Ranking: No. 6
League finish: Second in O-K Silver
Coach: Sue Smith, 12th season
Championship history: Seeking first top-two Finals finish.
Top score: 747.10 at the District.
Team composition: Nine total (three seniors, four juniors, two sophomores).
Outlook: NorthPointe will compete at the Finals for the first time since 2021 thanks to a second-place at its District and championship at its Regional against a field that included three more top-10 teams. NorthPointe won that Regional by five points after just missing making the Finals the year prior. Seniors Lindsay Ulstad, Addison Bey and Riley Paulk and junior Bella Barnett earned all-Regional honors last year.
HANOVER-HORTON
Ranking: No. 2
League finish: First in Cascades Conference
Coach: Sarah DuBois, 25th season
Championship history: Seeking first top-two Finals finish.
Top score: 768.40 at the District.
Team composition: 21 total (eight seniors, four juniors, five sophomores, four freshmen).
Outlook: Hanover-Horton finished sixth last season at its first Final, and the Comets have continued to climb this winter with nine straight overall scores of 740 or higher – after reaching 739.86 for a high score last season. Hanover-Horton has finished first or second at all of its competitions and broken 760 points each of its last three including while winning its District and finishing second at its Regional. Senior Alexyn DuBois made the all-state first team last season, senior Maddy Sauber made the second team and senior Reyna Collins earned honorable mention.
HUDSON
Ranking: No. 4
League finish: Second in Lenawee County Athletic Association
Coach: Kelly Bailey, 28th season
Championship history: Six MHSAA titles (most recent 2024), six runner-up finishes.
Top score: 758.08 at the District.
Team composition: 18 total (five seniors, four juniors, seven sophomores, two freshmen).
Outlook: Hudson ran its championship streak to five last season, winning by more than seven points. But the Tigers may have to climb this time after finishing second at their District and fourth at their Regional. Hudson did post its top scores of the season at those two most recent competitions, topping 754 points at both. Seniors Jayla Bright and Courtney Rodifer made the all-state first team last season, while sophomore Emmalin Rodifer made the second team and senior Kristtany Higgins, junior Emerson Sholl and sophomore Paige Butts earned honorable mentions.
MARION
Ranking: No. 10
League finish: Does not compete in a conference.
Coach: Danyel Prielipp, 27th season
Championship history: Seeking first top-two Finals finish.
Top score: 762.40 at the District.
Team composition: 12 total (four seniors, two juniors, one sophomore, five freshmen).
Outlook: Marion is another first-time Finals qualifier, advancing by winning its District by 15.3 points and then finishing third at its Regional among four ranked teams at the top. The District win was the team’s sixth in 11 competitions total. Seniors J’Lynn Schoonmaker, Malley Raymond and Ella Wilson and junior Aaliyah Nealey earned all-District honors last season.
NORWAY
Ranking: No. 8
League finish: Does not compete in a conference.
Coach: Hailey Micoley, third season
Championship history: Seeking first top-two Finals finish.
Top score: 751.78.
Team composition: 22 total (two seniors, five juniors, 10 sophomores, five freshmen).
Outlook: Norway finished its second-straight regular season having won all of its competitions, and also repeated as District champion. But this time the Knights jumped from seventh to second at their Regional to earn a return to the Finals for the first time since 2009. Senior Paige Roberts earned all-Regional recognition last season and is one of just seven upperclassmen on a team that finished 5.64 points behind winner NorthPointe at their Regional and should continue to build.
PEWAMO-WESTPHALIA
Ranking: No. 3
League finish: Does not compete in a conference.
Coach: Staci Myers, 18 season
Championship history: Nine MHSAA titles (most recent 2019), 13 runner-up finishes.
Top score: 771.14 at the Regional.
Team composition: 23 total (five seniors, six juniors, two sophomores, 10 freshmen).
Outlook: Last season’s runner-up appears plenty capable of making the jump to win its first championship since 2019, especially coming off a Regional-winning score that was more than 12 points higher than its previous best this season. The Pirates had finished second at their District by 12.11 points before winning the Regional by 5.08, and they’ve finished first or second at every competition this season. Seniors Addison Hengesbach and Caidence Nyhus and junior Karsyn Simmon made the all-state first team last season, seniors Jayde Ferguson and Miriam Downs made the second team, and junior Taryn Schafer and sophomore Brynn Feldpausch earned honorable mentions.
SANFORD MERIDIAN
Ranking: No. 1
League finish: First in Jack Pine Conference
Coach: Val MacKenzie, 35th season
Championship history: Division 4 runner-up 2018.
Top score: 772.88.
Team composition: 18 total (six seniors, two juniors, eight sophomores, two freshmen).
Outlook: Meridian – fifth a year ago – has not scored below 704 points at a competition this season, and is averaging an overall 745 –with three straight rounds of 760 or higher heading into this weekend. The Mustangs had won all of their meets before finishing third at their Regional. Senior Lexi Cryderman made the all-state first team last season, sophomores Marlee Kelly and Alyza Molski made the second team, and sophomores Ellie Beach and Payton Mathe earned honorable mentions.
PHOTO: Pewamo-Westphalia competes during its Regional last week at Michigan Center. (Photo by Jim Pivarnik.)