Class in Session: A History in Classification

July 24, 2017

By Rob Kaminski
MHSAA benchmarks editor

This is the first part in a series on MHSAA tournament classification, past and present, that will be published over the next two weeks. This series originally ran in this spring's edition of MHSAA benchmarks.

Conversation and discussion at the March 2017 MHSAA Representative Council Meeting leaned heavily toward the subject of 8-Player Football and how to properly balance its tournament with the growing number of schools sponsoring the sport.

While the proposal to split the tournament into two divisions beginning with the 2017 school year was adopted, the MHSAA then faced questions such as when to set the divisions, how to determine qualifiers and where to host the championship games.

The topic continues to create a buzz in Class D schools across both peninsulas, and likely will do into the start of school this fall.

Likewise, the lone holdouts still conducting tournaments by class – MHSAA Boys and Girls Basketball and Girls Volleyball – took center stage at the May Council discussion, and following the 2017-18 school year, class is out for good. Both genders of basketball, and girls volleyball, will move to divisional formats thereafter.

There is much to be decided to be sure; but as those in education are well aware, history is the best teacher.

Fortunately for the sports in flux and for all sports under the governance of the MHSAA, the Association more or less wrote the book on the subject of sport classification. Following is a history lesson, with a little advanced division thrown in.

Class structure

Credited with being the first state with multiple tournament classifications, Michigan’s attention to trends and shifts in philosophy aimed at fair play and equal tournament opportunity can be traced from 80 years ago to the present.

In the earliest years of the MHSAA, there were four classifications for elections and tournaments –  Classes A, B, C and D. Classes C and D had far more schools than Classes A and B. For example, 80 years ago (1937), there were only 58 schools in Class A, 94 schools in Class B, 297 schools in Class C and 253 schools in Class D.

Gradually through the years, as Michigan’s major cities spawned suburbs, there was a shift in the other direction to the point 30 years ago (1987) when school size became more balanced: 173 Class A schools, 178 Class B schools, 179 Class C schools and 182 Class D schools.

Up until 1987, the MHSAA published the dividing line between each classification, after which schools submitted their enrollments. Then, for 1988 and thereafter, the MHSAA adopted the plan of gathering all enrollments first and then placing 25 percent of the schools in each of four classes. This completed the equalization of the number of schools in each class for elections.

However, the change for 1988 did nothing to equalize the number of teams actually entered by each class in each sport. And unlike the early years of the Association when there were many more Class C and D teams than A and B teams, there were more Class A and B teams than C and D teams entering MHSAA tournaments decades later.

Moreover, the difference in number of teams entered in the different classifications for a sport continued to increase as many small schools, the fastest growing portion of the MHSAA's membership, sponsor only a few sports, or they sponsor no sports at all but enter into cooperative programs with other schools.

Because of these differences, Class A or B schools sometimes had to win twice as many games as Class C or D schools to reach the MHSAA Finals in a sport. At times, the larger classifications had District Tournaments, even rat-tail games, and/or a Quarterfinal game, and the smaller classifications did not. Most Class D Districts have had four teams (some only three), while Class A Districts often had seven or eight teams. In Regional levels of individual sports, the number of entries in the larger classification once greatly outnumbered those in the smaller classifications of the tournament for the same sport.

Over the years, these dividing lines between classes escalated gradually, as did the differences in enrollments of largest and small schools in each class. In 1937 the dividing lines were 700, 300 and 100 between Class A and B, B and C, and C and D, respectively. By 1987, the dividing lines were 1,129, 571 and 298, respectively, leading to the current method of collecting enrollments and then setting the classification.

With the pendulum swinging well past center by the late 1980s, coaches associations, MHSAA sport committees, tournament managers and school administrators began discussion and offered proposals to correct what many believed had become a flawed system of MHSAA tournament classification.

At the 1996 MHSAA Update Meetings, ¾ of 858 respondents to that year’s annual survey indicated they favored a system that would divide schools which actually sponsor each sport into two, three or four nearly equal divisions.

Problem solving

At its meeting May 4-6, 1997, the Representative Council defeated a motion that would have adopted in one action a coordinated plan of reclassification for all sports to equalize the number of schools in each tournament for each respective sport. Instead, the Council discussed and voted on each proposal that had been presented from sport committees.

This resulted in the Representative Council adopting four equal divisions for baseball and softball, four equal divisions for boys and girls tennis, four equal divisions for boys soccer and three equal divisions for girls soccer, effective with the 1997-98 school year. Helping in the decision was the success of the 1995-96 MHSAA Wrestling season, which saw the sport move to four divisions for its tournament structure

The Council delayed action on similar proposals for football and boys golf at that time to glean additional input. The same decision was made with respect to a proposal from the Ice Hockey Committee that would have split the Class A schools in two divisions and left the Class B/C/D Tournament unchanged.

“The gist of the move from classes to divisions was to equalize the path to championships for students of all schools, regardless of the size of those schools,” said MHSAA Executive Director Jack Roberts.

While the restructuring accomplished that goal for the majority of competitors, opposition exists now as it did then. The primary argument in opposition to the changes is that, in some sports, it increases the range between largest and smallest schools in the division for smallest schools, even as the range is usually reduced for other divisions.

Larger schools offered a counterpoint.

“The larger schools suggested that while they may have more students, they also attempt to sponsor more sports than the smaller schools, in some cases spreading the enrollment as thin as a much smaller school with fewer sports,” Roberts said.

“Even today, the idea of four equal divisions can be unpopular among some Class D schools which feel especially burdened by the equal division concept,” Roberts said. “There was enough opposition in 1997 that equal divisions were rejected for boys and girls basketball and girls volleyball, and some of that opposition remains.”

The numbers of schools sponsoring each MHSAA tournament are still close to the totals today, with the exception of soccer in both genders, which has enjoyed substantial increases. This spring, 466 girls teams were scheduled to compete in the MHSAA Soccer Tournament, while 473 boys teams will suit up this fall.

Since the beginning of MHSAA divisions in 1996 with wrestling, 147 additional team champions have been crowned and countless individuals have known the thrill of victory due to an extra level of Finals in various sports. Girls soccer has seen the most growth in opportunity, moving from two classes in 1987 to three divisions the following year, and then four divisions in 2000. Boys soccer had enjoyed four classes for two years prior to the new four-division format, and it was the sport of soccer that helped to create a caveat in the nearly equal division movement.

Lower Peninsula boys and girls swimming & diving expanded from two to three divisions in 2008, while boys and girls bowling are the most recent sports to enjoy increased tournament opportunity, adding a fourth division in 2010.

“Fairness is in the eye of the beholder. While having the same number of schools in each division is one kind of fairness, holding in check the enrollment range between the largest and smallest schools in Division 4 is another kind of fairness that is dear to a great number of people,” Roberts said. “Because more schools sponsor basketball and volleyball than other sports, Class D schools would have been least affected by the equal divisions concept in those sports; but that, and ‘tradition,’ did not dissuade the opponents in the 1990s.”

The shift to divisions not only paved the way for student-athletes, but also assisted administrators and schools hosting tournaments. MHSAA tournament mangers looked to equal divisions to more closely equalize the number of schools in District or Regional Tournaments and to better equalize the length of day required for these rounds of tournaments, both for management and participating teams and individuals.

Pinning down an answer

Wrestling became the first MHSAA Tournament to be conducted in nearly equal divisions when team and individual champions were crowned in Divisions 1, 2, 3 and 4 rather than Classes A, B, C/D for the 1996 winter championships. 

The movement was well received, as schools saw more opportunity for success: four champions where there once were three at the District, Regional and Final levels, and a smaller range of enrollment between the smallest and largest school in all four tournaments, leading to the impetus for the Fall 1996 Update Meeting Survey of schools regarding similar movement in other sports.

Team champions that year were Holt (D1), Petoskey (D2), Middleville Thornapple Kellogg (D3) and Dundee (D4).

Getting their kicks

When the "equal divisions" concept was approved by the Representative Council for most MHSAA Tournaments for the 1997-98 school year, there was opposition from the smallest schools which, under the equal divisions, are forced to play against larger schools than reside in Class D. Compelling arguments were made – and still are – that an enrollment difference between schools with smaller enrollments (e.g., Class D) is more difficult to overcome in athletic competition than an even larger enrollment difference between schools with larger enrollments (e.g., Class A).

The opposition was most intense in soccer because of the number of students needed to field a team and the physical nature of the sport. As a result, from 2000-01 through 2010-11, soccer operated with a “20-percent modification.” This placed 20 percent of all schools that actually sponsored soccer in Division 4, and the remaining 80 percent were placed equally in Divisions 1, 2 and 3.

At the time the 20 percent modification was adopted, it was also established that soccer would return to four equal divisions when the largest Division 4 soccer school had an enrollment equal to or smaller than the mid­ point for Class C schools. That occurred in 2010.

Last class on the schedule

In the same volume of “history being the best teacher,” one can also find the adage, “times change.” While the division format was a welcome change in some sports, others were left to hold class without change.

In the sports of boys and girls basketball, and girls volleyball, the number of schools sponsoring the sports were so close to the overall membership of the MHSAA that divisions were not necessary; the enrollment breakdowns themselves were enough to delineate equal opportunity for tournament success.

That is no longer the case, according to MHSAA membership. The last move from classes to divisions occurred for the 2006-07 school year following Council action. Before this May, that is. Action at the most recent Representative Council meeting, May 2017, called for the shift to divisions for MHSAA Boys and Girls Basketball, and Girls Volleyball, beginning with the 2018-19 season.

“Because the MHSAA Volleyball Committee had requested this change several times a number of years ago, and because the Council felt the change inevitable, there should not be further delay,” Roberts said. “It is an important detail that the Class D maximum has dropped 50 students over the past decade so the objection that much larger schools would be competing in Division 4 isn’t very strong now.”

Using the 2017-18 enrollment figures, just eight Class C schools would be competing in Division 4 for boys basketball, 11 for girls basketball and 14 for girls volleyball.

Good things came of the previous most-recent switches in 2006-07. Competitive Cheer was re-classified from Class A, B and C-D into four equal divisions assisting in the rapid growth of sponsoring schools (approximately 80 schools per division). Alpine skiing was changed from Class A and B-C­ D to two equal divisions.

At that time, the MHSAA Basketball Committee had recommended to the Council the study of increased classifications, but status quo remained.

Back on the grid

As such, MHSAA Basketball and Volleyball remained the only holdovers of the MHSAA class structure. Discussion resurfaced periodically during the last two decades to bring those tournaments in line with the other MHSAA sports.

Regular-season football-playing schools are separated by class, then are reshuffled by divisions for the playoffs. Football, as we know, underwent a significant postseason facelift in the late 1990s.

While MHSAA Football also remained a class sport through 1998, it had expanded from four to eight classes from 1990-98, becoming the first MHSAA sport to crown more than four team champions. Member schools were asked to consider a pair of options in November of 1997. One called for eight equal divisions, and the second would leave Class D by itself as division 8, and split Class A, B and C schools into seven nearly equal divisions.

After much discussion, retooling, and crunching of formulas, the MHSAA unveiled its revised Football Playoff model that continues to roll today, nearly 20 years later. It was determined that 256 teams would qualify for the tournament based first on a minimum of six wins, then by Playoff Points determined by formula. From there, the field would be divided into eight divisions, with the field being filled out by a nearly equal number of five-win teams in each division as needed to reach 256.

Eight championships would indeed be enough, until football sponsorship among the MHSAA’s smallest schools – some with rich football traditions – began to trend downward. The MHSAA again went to the drawing board, examining the viability of 8-player football. After an experimental year in 2010 without a tournament, the 8-player game was playoff-ready for 2011, with a field of 16 qualifiers embarking on a four-week tournament.

Not only did the 8-player option restore recently canceled programs, but it also created teams in schools which previously had none, and convinced some 11-player schools that this new division was the best path to take.

What did this do for the Class D holdovers staying in the traditional 11-player game? Well, a couple of things, positive and negative. As two and three dozen Class D schools opted for the 8-player game, the remaining 11-player Class D schools at times found themselves in disrupted leagues and had to travel further to complete schedules. They also competed against larger teams in Division 8 of the 11-player MHSAA Football Playoffs.

However, the growth of the 8-player game among the smallest schools also resulted in more Class D schools qualifying for the MHSAA Football Playoffs than ever before. In 2012, an all-time high 44 percent of Class D schools sponsoring football qualified for either the 8-player tournament or Division 8 of the 11-player tournament. That compared to 42.2 percent of Class C schools, 44.9 percent of Class B schools and 41.6 percent of Class A schools which qualified for the 2012 playoffs.

Much is to be determined in the most recent chapter of MHSAA Tournament expansion as the 8-Player Football Playoffs welcome a second division. As the past illustrates, there will be pluses and minuses. History also shows that the MHSAA has received maximum input from its constituents, researched all possibilities, and will find solutions to questions still in the balance before an additional group of athletes hoists a new trophy in November.

Through the Years

A chronology of when which sports moved from Class to Division in the MHSAA. 

1995-96: LP Wrestling

1997-98: Baseball, Boys Soccer, Girls Soccer, Softball, LP Girls Tennis, LP Boys Tennis

1998-99: LP Boys Golf, LP Girls Golf

1999-2000: Ice Hockey, LP Boys Track & Field, LP Girls Track & Field

2000-01: LP Boys Cross Country, LP Girls Cross Country, UP Boys Cross Country, UP Girls Cross Country, UP Boys Golf, UP Girls Golf, UP Boys Tennis, UP Girls Tennis, UP Boys Track & Field, UP Girls Track & Field

2002-03: LP Girls Swimming & Diving, LP Boys Swimming & Diving

2005-06: Boys Bowling, Girls Bowling

2006-07: Girls Competitive Cheer, Boys Skiing, Girls Skiing

2018-19: Boys Basketball, Girls Basketball, Girls Volleyball

Note: Boys and Girls Lacrosse has been a divisional sport since it began in during the 2004-05 school year.

Preview: From 119 to 8 Set to Compete at Inaugural MHSAA Boys Volleyball Finals

By Geoff Kimmerly
MHSAA.com senior editor

June 4, 2026

Two years of tournament planning and several more of coaches association organization and support have brought us to the first MHSAA Boys Volleyball Finals weekend at Battle Creek’s Kellogg Arena.

This first year of MHSAA sponsorship saw 119 tournament-eligible teams compete, with the final eight to play for championships in Divisions 1 and 2.

This weekend’s schedule:

Semifinals – Friday
Division 1

Grand Haven vs. Macomb Dakota, 4:30 p.m.
Lake Orion vs. Northville, 6:30 p.m.

Division 2
Grand Rapids South Christian vs. Walled Lake Central, Noon
Lowell vs. Auburn Hills Oakland Christian, 2 p.m.

Finals – Saturday
Division 1, 2:30 p.m.  
Division 2, Noon

Tickets cost $11 for both Friday’s Semifinals and Saturday’s Finals, and one ticket is good for all matches that day. All six matches also will be broadcast on MHSAA.tv. Find more information, including how to purchase tickets, on the Boys Volleyball page.

Below is a glance at all four contenders in each division. (Statistics are through Regional Finals.)

Division 1

GRAND HAVEN
Record/rank:
 39-1, No. 1
Coach: Jim VanTol
League finish: First in Ottawa-Kent Conference Rainbow III
Players to watch: Maddox Krugler, 6-3 jr. OH (336 kills, .328 hitting %, 40 aces); Caleb Cryst, 6-1 sr. S (672 assists, 101 kills); Alfredo Ellis, 6-3 jr. OPP (252 kills, .302 hitting %61 blocks, 128 digs).
Finals forecast: The Buccaneers have more than made good on expectations they’d be a contender this spring, defeating No. 2 Jenison, No. 4 Hudsonville and honorable mentions Rockford and Zeeland during this tournament run, with the loss to Jenison in their regular-season finale. That defeat came without Cryst, who was injured at the time but is back and won the inaugural Mr. Volleyball Award from the coaches association. Grand Haven finished as a state runner-up the last three seasons before MHSAA sponsorship of the sport began this spring. Sophomore 6-2 outside hitter John Cryst also contributes in several ways, tying for the team lead in aces (44), ranking second in assists (182) and digs (192) and third in kills (222) entering the week.

LAKE ORION
Record/rank:
 22-0, No. 10
Coach: Tony Scavarda
League finish: First in Oakland Activities Association Red
Players to watch: Jan Ludvik, 6-2 sr. OH (406 kills, .345 hitting %, 45 aces, 258 digs); Owen Dyer, 5-10 jr. S (306 assists), Kuba Wolski, 5-11 sr. OH (225 kills, 40 aces).
Finals forecast: The Dragons – state semifinalists a year ago – have lost only five sets this season and defeated No. 5 Farmington in four to advance to this weekend. Lake Orion also swept honorable mention North Farmington in their only meeting this season. Ludvik and Wolski are the team’s leading hitters but only senior starters.

MACOMB DAKOTA
Record/rank:
 20-9-3, unranked
Coach: Alec Arena
League finish: First in Macomb Area Conference Red
Players to watch: Samuel Yang, 5-5 sr. S (383 assists, 118 digs); Matthew Lefever, 6-0 sr. OH (213 kills, 45 aces); Nathan Allport, 6-1 soph. OH (212 kills, 41 aces).
Finals forecast: Dakota is 11-2-2 since April 30 and lost only two sets over four postseason matches on the way to Battle Creek. Senior 6-foot-6 middle Andrew Thamarus is another top hitter and led the team with 55 blocks entering the week, with 6-5 right-side Joseph Trachsel right behind with 50.

NORTHVILLE
Record/rank:
 32-7-1, No. 8
Coach: Nyia Setla
League finish: First in Kensington Lakes Activities Association
Players to watch: Julian Janisse, 6-1 sr. RS (325 kills, 54 aces, 43 blocks, 196 digs); Jude Butler-Shriner, 5-11 sr. S (713 kills, 54 aces, 181 digs); Yuta Kikumori, 5-7 sr. OH (194 kills, 45 aces, 190 digs).
Finals forecast: Northville advanced to this weekend with a win over No. 9 Hartland, the only team to deal the Mustangs a KLAA loss this season – although Northville had previously avenged that defeat during the league tournament as well. The Mustangs also avenged a regular-season loss to No. 3 Saline in the Regional Final. Junior outside hitter Subhash Tej Buchu (141 kills entering this week) and 6-3 senior middle Adam Piao (112 kills) give Northville two more significant hitting options.

Division 2

AUBURN HILLS OAKLAND CHRISTIAN
Record/rank:
 11-2, unranked
Coach: Alex Redford
League finish: Does not compete in a conference.
Players to watch: Andrew Redford, sr. MB (104 kills, .385 hitting %, 141 digs); Efraim Lopes, soph. S/RS (151 assists); Micah Redford, soph. OH (57 aces, 168 digs). (Heights not provided.)
Finals forecast: Oakland Christian has lost only two sets over four postseason matches and fell this season only to Division 1 Rochester Hills Stoney Creek and Clarkston. Micah Redford also is the team’s second leading hitter, and junior Luke Reyes (139 assists entering this week) joins Lopes in a two-setter system.

GRAND RAPIDS SOUTH CHRISTIAN
Record/rank:
 27-13-2, No. 6
Coach: Mya Udell
League finish: Third in O-K Conference Rainbow II
Players to watch: Noah Jager, sr. MB (234 kills, 61 blocks); Ezra Miller, sr. S (633 assists, 173 digs); Noah Klump, sr. OH (229 kills, 220 digs). (Heights not provided.)
Finals forecast: South Christian advanced to these first Semifinals in part with a five-set Regional Final win over No. 8 Holland Christian and a four-setter over No. 4 St. Joseph in the Quarterfinal. All six starters plus the team’s libero are seniors, with outside hitter Jack Borish also over 200 kills this season and Brock Hoekwater with 390 digs entering the week.

LOWELL
Record/rank:
 25-6, No. 1
Coach: Drew Davidson
League finish: First in River Cities Alliance
Players to watch: Max Davidson, 6-2 sr. S/OH (328 kills, .333 hitting %, 473 assists); Josh Wolters, 6-4 jr. M (299 kills, .300 hitting %, 44 aces, 218 digs); Issac Kissinger, 5-10 fr. S/RS (175 kills, 224 assists).
Finals forecast: Lowell won four straight state championships before this first MHSAA-sponsored season, and swept No. 2 Grand Rapids Christian, Midland, No. 9 Mount Pleasant and honorable mention Greenville during this tournament run. The only losses this spring came three times to Grand Haven and once apiece to Jenison, Grand Rapids Christian and Holland Christian. Junior right-side Lincoln Pollema and freshman outside hitter Jaeger Smith also have topped 100 kills.

WALLED LAKE CENTRAL
Record/rank:
 24-19, unranked
Coach: Miguel Strauss
League finish: Third in Lakes Valley Conference
Players to watch: Jerry Hempfield, 6-0 sr. OH/S; Kai Waynick, 6-1 soph. S/OH. (Statistics not submitted.)
Finals forecast: Central defeated honorable mention Warren Woods Tower entering the postseason and then swept all four of its tournament matches – with the Regional Semifinal win over rival Walled Lake Western including two sets decided by two points apiece as those two evened their season series at 3-3. Hempfield is one of only two seniors.

PHOTO Grand Haven’s Caleb Cryst (7) sets his team’s offense during a 3-0 Division 1 Quarterfinal win over Hudsonville on Wednesday. (Photo by Trevor McCue/Grand Haven Tribune).