Prepping for the Long Run

May 9, 2014

By Rob Kaminski
MHSAA benchmarks editor

Case studies of Middle Child Syndrome range far and wide in the world of family psychology. But at the center of most dialogue regarding those affected is a feeling of being ignored or left out.

Within the family tree of scholastic sports, however, there’s no better time to be in the middle, as the tween and early teen generation is commanding the MHSAA’s utmost attention.

While participation numbers for high school athletics continue to hold steady in Michigan, junior high/middle school membership in the MHSAA is on the decline. In just the last seven years, membership among the vital group has dropped by exactly 100 buildings, from 831 schools in 2005-06 to 731 this year. That figure represents just 36.5% of the nearly 2,000 schools in the 2013 Michigan Education Directory serving 7th- and 8th-graders.

The number of high schools comprising the MHSAA now is greater than that of the feeder schools, bewildering when considering that a large percentage of high schools draw students from at least two junior high/middle schools.

To reverse the trend, the first order of business is to identify reasons junior highs and middle schools are leaving the MHSAA, or in more numerous cases, not joining the association at the start.

Armed with data from the 2013 MHSAA Update Meeting Survey and positions advanced by the MHSAA Junior High/Middle School Committee, a task force has been formed to examine problems and recommend solutions.

“We didn’t have an overwhelming ‘Yes’ or ‘No,’ or definitive answers, through the Update Meeting Survey on the various junior high/middle school topics. There are so many models in existence throughout the state. Some have grades 5-8, some 6, 7 and 8, some K-12,” said MHSAA Representative Council member Karen Leinaar, explaining her motion at the December Council meeting that a task force be formed.

“We hope the task force can provide information and direction by putting different minds together to narrow down some action plans to encourage more junior high/middle school membership,” added Leinaar, athletic director at Bear Lake, a K-12 building.

“When you see the numbers, it makes you scratch your head and think, ‘What can we do to get that number to at least 50 percent,” said fellow Council member Jason Mellema,  superintendent at Pewamo-Westphalia Schools. “I’d like the task force to approach schools which aren’t members currently and ask, ‘Why?’ Those responses will be valuable.”

At the heart of the matter are separate but parallel discussions aimed at making junior high/middle school membership more attractive.  Implementing either of the two requires different measures of MHSAA protocol.

The first matter would require MHSAA Representative Council action. These issues pertain to lengths of contests and seasons at the middle school level. Lengthening seasons and/or contests could provide more ample playing time for schools which currently find it difficult to mete out opportunities for all students in the program.

The second consideration involves the inclusion of 6th-graders into school athletic programs. Such action would require an MHSAA Constitutional change which would be confirmed by a two-thirds favorable vote on a ballot authorized by the Representative Council.

Extending the arm of MHSAA membership to 6th-graders might enable smaller school districts to begin programs and teams where currently none exist due to low enrollments.

In communities of all sizes, 6th-grade participation could encourage students to join school teams at an earlier age, exposing them to the values and benefits of school-based sports vs. community sports in which many youngsters are already participating.

“AAU (Amateur Athletic Union) and community-based sports aren’t going away,” said MHSAA Council member Steve Newkirk, principal at Clare Middle School. “What is our rationale when we examine lengthening seasons or extending our role to include 6th-graders? If we’re jumping into this attempting to control something that we can’t control, that’s not the right reason. But, if we can increase participation in some schools which otherwise wouldn’t have programs, then we need to figure out how to do that.”

In a nutshell, the keys to increasing membership among the MHSAA’s younger students are speculative at this point.

There does seem to be growing consensus, however, that when a new model is unveiled, it will be up to local leadership to grab the keys and drive the vehicle down the right roads.

Matter of minutes

Like an older or younger sibling, “burnout” gets a lot of attention from sports study professionals as a significant reason many young people walk away from sports.

Too much, too soon. Too much specialization. Data certainly exists to support both.

Often overlooked is exclusion. Not getting enough playing time, not feeling like part of the team, practicing just as hard but only playing the meaningless “fifth quarter.”

The MHSAA sets forth season and contest limitations for both its senior high schools and junior high/middle schools.

Survey data illustrates that Michigan is more restrictive than some neighboring states, and there seems to be growing momentum among constituents to lengthen contests rather than seasons.

“It’s interesting to see what some of the other states have in place, and in many instances we allow significantly fewer contests,” said Mellema. “Maybe increasing the number of contests would be the hook for increasing our membership.”

Michigan’s restrictions on the number of contests are a bit more stringent from others surveyed. However, the mood from January’s Junior High/Middle School Committee Meeting at the MHSAA, along with the flavor from last fall’s Update Meetings, seems to signify little desire for change.

When invested personnel were asked whether they would favor increased basketball and soccer schedules at the middle school level, the answer was ‘No,’ to the tune of 60 percent regarding basketball and 68 percent when it came to soccer.

“Our coaches want practice time, and increasing the number of games would actually take away from practice time,” said Kevin Polston, who heads the athletic department at a 7th-8th-grade building in Grand Haven. “Increasing the length of contests would be favored over playing more actual games.”

Early dismissal from school, increased transportation, contest officials and game management expenses also work against the notion of upping the number of events.

“When we talk about adding games, I see dollar signs,” said Blissfield’s Steve Babbitt. “More buses, more officials, more game management.”

Adding dates to schedules might also bring unwanted consequences to the school calendar.

“If we were to add contests, particularly in the fall, then the practice start dates might become an issue to get in the proper number of days before the season begins,” said Joe Alessandrini of Livonia. “We’d have to start practice before school begins.”

One problem inherent to late summer practice at the junior high/middle school level is that, unlike high school, many coaches use the first weeks of school simply to recruit kids to try out for their teams.

Gaining far greater momentum at the recent Committee Meeting was the advocacy for longer games through the addition of a couple minutes per quarter.

That position is further bolstered by the Update Meeting Survey, which revealed respondents’ favoring an increase in basketball quarters from six to 8 minutes, and for a “fifth quarter” in football to allow more students the opportunity to compete.

Just over half of the survey takers (52 to 48 percent) were more reluctant to add minutes to football quarters, but several JH/MS Committee Members point to longer football games as a key to participation. On many occasions, it was reported, football teams have run nearly all the time out of a quarter without the other team touching the ball. And, kids who only play the “fifth quarter” aren’t fooled by their roles if they only play when the game is over and nothing counts. Incorporating them into the flow of the game is preferred.

Others in the meeting discussed ways in which coaches rotated team units during a contest, and conference guidelines which have been established to promote participation while still allowing teams to be competitive at the ends of games.

“My concern when looking at game times is that we need to be specific and put constraints on how many minutes or quarters kids can play. That becomes tricky,” said Mellema.

“I’d like to have this meeting recorded to show that our opinions are not isolated; that we all share the same views, values and issues throughout the state,” said Constantine’s Mike Messner during the January meeting.

And that’s where influence at the local level from experienced school leaders is paramount.

“Our good intentions sometimes are not carried out the way we meant for them to be,” Leinaar said. “We have to impress on our schools why these changes are taking place, if we change things like length of seasons or contests.

“If it’s about winning, adding eight or 10 minutes to each game won’t change anything. If we add games, we see it as increased opportunities for kids, but coaches might not use it that way.”

Former MHSAA Assistant Director Randy Allen, who presided over JH/MS Committee Meetings in recent years, added, “The details of this can never be carried out or achieved by the state association. We can provide a tool to help achieve the goal of increased participation, but our schools have to implement it to be effective.”

Pleading the 6th

Even altering season and contest limits won’t address participation issues if kids can’t play.

Enter the debate over welcoming 6th-graders into the scholastic sports mix, an even hotter and more divided topic than game and season duration. 

Whereas support for amending the MHSAA Constitution once lingered just below level ground, the most recent Update Meeting Survey is creating a groundswell, if not yet of seismic proportions.

In 2008, 47.5 percent of member schools indicated a desire to include 6th-graders in the MHSAA  Handbook. Last fall, that figure rose to 59.4 percent overall, and up to 61.1 percent for just those individuals responsible for 7th and 8th-grade students in their districts.

It is worth noting that in more nearly 80 percent of school districts which include MHSAA member schools, 6th-graders share the same building with 7th- and 8th-graders.

Let the opening arguments begin.

“We’re talking 60 percent who are in favor of amending the Constitution. That’s a significant number,” Mellema said. “For larger schools with good numbers and only 7th- and 8th-graders in the buildings, it’s not an issue. But some smaller schools wouldn’t have teams without 6th-graders.”

Yet, in most places, 6th-graders are playing anyway, just not wearing the school colors.

“Because there are so many outside groups that have keyed in on kids at such a young age, I think it’s time to reach out to the younger grades to maintain educational athletics,” said Leinaar. “Fewer kids are on the playgrounds. Parents have them scheduled for soccer, judo, piano, and anything else you can think of. So, we should take the opportunity to develop the team concept in an educational setting without the little league mom and dad coaches.”

There is sentiment that the work needs to be focused in-house, or in the hallways, with deference to non-school athletic opportunities.

“It’s not about competing with outside entities,” said Brian Swinehart, athletic director of Walled Lake schools. “It’s about providing the best experience for those who are in our schools; getting them more opportunity to play.”

And getting them to play with structured coaching regulations. Within the MHSAA, members are strongly encouraged to hire coaches who are employed by the school district. Non-faculty coaches are required to be listed on forms submitted to the MHSAA, and in the very near future, all MHSAA coaches will be required to complete Coaches Advancement Courses and courses in basic safety and first aid.

“I coach my son in AAU wrestling, and my eyes opened up when I found that anyone with $18 and a computer could be a coach,” Newkirk said. “Anyone under the sun can coach.

“We need to get to the root of what it is we’re trying to accomplish. Is our goal the opportunity to play school sports or is the undercurrent to impact AAU sports? Maybe there’s a way to work with the coaches who are coming into our buildings and collaborate with them to have them buy into our values and philosophies.”

Polston echoed those sentiments at the JH/MS Committee meeting.

“If adding 6th-graders is to further our competitive nature versus non-school activities, I don’t think we’re ever going to do well at that,” Polston said. “Their philosophy is to win, and ours is education and value based.”

Just as school-based athletics differ from outside organizations, there also can be marked differences in the lives of youths as they move from elementary to junior high and middle schools. Such social transition periods are also considered.

“We’re already asking kids to grow up way too fast,” said Newkirk, whose school in Clare is 5th-8th grade. “It used to be Hot Wheels, Barbie Dolls and G.I. Joes, and now it’s all cell phones and texting and dating. Adding sports to those dynamics might create just another source of stress.”

The counterpoint could spotlight the exclusion factor again.

“I’m in a 6th-8th-grade building, and there’s a void for 6th-graders,” said Alan Alsbro of Berrien Springs.

Messner reiterates concerns that 6th-grade sports might be too much, too soon at a pivotal age for students, and also mentions certain buzzwords that are like nails on a chalkboard to all levels of school sports leaders: finances and facilities.

“We’re a 6-8 building, and we’ve always felt that the 6th-grade year is a year of adjustment academically and socially, so let’s start athletics in 7th grade,” Messner said. “And, we’ve already had to budget out freshman-level sports at the high school, so how can we justify 6th-grade? We’re not going to find a pot of money.”

Cash will always be a concern for school programs, but the facilities and transportation arguments are quickly debunked by some.

“We have 5th- and 6th-grade teams that are school-based right now. We don’t pay the coaches, don’t collect participation fees or take physicals, but they do use our facilities, and we find room and time in the schedule,” Mellema said.

“Some schools treat the lower grades as intramurals, still hosting the events in their facilities, so it can be done if we expand our programs down a grade,” Leinaar said. “People say, ‘Oh that’d be a lot of work.’ Yeah. It would, but you just have to figure out a way to do it.”

The facility and finance issue could, in fact, be a moot point. A change to the Constitution would not necessarily force schools to sponsor stand- alone 6th-grade teams. In fact, the change might not mandate schools include 6th-graders at all.

A change would simply provide the opportunity for participation. The underlying feeling within the JH/MS Committee was that local boards and conferences would determine the extent of 6th-grade participation.

“I think the fear of 6th-grade stand-alone teams could deter some districts from having their middle schools join the MHSAA,” said Sean Zaborowski of St. Clair Shores. “It’s not viable to have 6th-grade-only football teams, basketball teams, etc. The question becomes whether to allow them to participate with 7th-and 8th-graders.”

For some, it might simply be a question of need, on a sport-by-sport basis.

“We have enough numbers that we don’t need 6th-graders to fill out rosters,” said Muskegon’s Todd Farmer of his 7-8 building. “Only the cross country people are asking about it. And, if we allow 6th-graders to participate, then do we allow 7th-graders to play with 8th-graders?”

That is another piece to the puzzle with which administrators are wrestling, in some cases quite literally.

Contact list

Wrestling is one of the sports most in need of 6th-grade participants, if for nothing more than filling the lightest weight classes.

The Update Meeting Survey showed nearly 42 percent in favor of 6th-graders competing with 7th- and 8th-graders in wrestling. Among “contact” sports, only basketball received slightly more support at 52 percent.

“Non-contact sports is where the focus should be,” Alsbro said. “In the non-contact sports, I think it’s a no-brainer to get students exposed to competition without getting their brains knocked out.”

The fall survey backs that sentiment with support as high as 73 percent in cross country and 67 percent in track & field. Football, ice hockey and lacrosse yield percentages of 72 or above opposed to 6th-graders playing with 7th- and 8th-graders.

Leinaar speculates that it might be time to include 6th-graders in all “non-combative” sports.

Wrestling certainly falls in the contact category, but it is individual in nature. The JH/MS Committee suggested that the MHSAA Task Force consider the merits of team vs. individual sports as the natural division as to the inclusion of 6th-graders on the same teams as their 7th- and 8th-grade classmates. 

Recent MHSAA waiver requests indicate a movement for such action to be taken. Consider the following:

  • During the 2011-12 school year, 40 school districts made requests to the MHSAA Executive Committee to waive Regulation III, Section 1, pursuant to what is now Interpretation 262 so that 6th-graders could compete with and against 7th- and 8th-graders. The Executive Committee approved 37 of those requests.


  • During the 2012-13 school year, 50 school districts made this request to allow 6th-graders on 7th- and 8th-grade teams, and 46 requests were approved.

The majority of these requests came in the sports of basketball, cross country, and track & field. On several occasions, schools were granted permission in all sports other than football, ice hockey and wrestling.

Interpretation 262 also states that requests may be submitted by the administration of “smaller member junior high/middle schools.” This might have deterred some districts from seeking 6th-grade participation and, in turn, eliminated the possibility of fielding a team in some cases.

In light of such history and language, the JH/MS Committee asked to forward the following positions to the Task Force and beyond:

  • Change the current 6th-grade waiver process to allow schools of any enrollment size to be considered for waivers on a case-by-case basis that is need-specific, not granted only to small enrollment schools.


  • Eliminate the waiver requirement for 6th-grade participation in individual sports, and maintain the waiver process and criteria for team sports.

Even with a Constitutional amendment to include 6th-graders in programs statewide, decisions would have to be made locally as to which teams they may be a part.

Outside the hallways

In addition to the primary topics of season and contest limitations and 6th-grade participation, the JH/MS Committee was asked for suggestions on how the MHSAA could retain current JH/MS members and make membership more attractive to schools not currently members. The following thoughts were expressed for consideration:

  • Make membership required for those junior high/middle schools of MHSAA senior high schools. In other words, require district-wide membership (fully recognizing the difficulty with private school members).


  • Provide MHSAA CAP courses at no charge or at a greatly reduced cost to JH/MS members.


  • Modify the Limited Team Membership Rule at grades 7-8 to allow some participation in the same sport with non-school programs during the school season. Such allowance would have restrictions, to be determined.


  • Give member schools flexibility on the start of fall football practices.


  • Allow more local league and conference decision-making within broad statewide MHSAA regulations.

This input from the JH/MS Committee will be an important voice in the deliberations of the JH/MS Task Force that will convene multiple times during 2014 to bring a breadth and depth of study unprecedented on this topic in the MHSAA’s long history.

The quest for increased membership among the state’s junior high/middle schools – and thus, increased participation within the framework of educational athletics – is of utmost importance to the health and future of high school athletics.

Quoting MHSAA Executive Director Jack Roberts from his blog Oct. 8 on MHSAA.com, “School sports needs to market itself better, and part of better is to be available earlier – much sooner in the lives of youth.”

It is an age group that can no longer be ignored, or take a back seat to its older brothers and sisters.

Online & On-Demand, Video 24/7

August 14, 2014

By Rob Kaminski
MHSAA benchmarks editor

During the 2009-10 school year, the MHSAA dipped its toe into the video streaming currents by launching a pilot program with schools from the Capital Area Activities Conference in mid-Michigan.

Participating schools were provided equipment and a robust streaming platform through When We Were Young Productions and its technical partner, PlayOn! Sports.

The year before, more than 400 events were aired on MHSAA.tv and with its cable television partner, Comcast Cable, but this was going to break new ground. This plan – known then as the Digital Broadcasting Program – was going to allow students to stream content of classmates during competition, and upload to a web portal for all to see. High school sports in Michigan had a stage on which to display its product.

“And, it was free,” said MHSAA Communications Director John Johnson, recalling the “old” days of just five years ago. “We were able to provide more content to more viewers than ever before, and the results proved that we had an audience. Not only are our student-athletes being showcased, but their classmates are producing the content and gaining hands-on experience in a rapidly growing area of technology. It’s a win-win.”

Traffic on MHSAA.tv more than doubled during the early years, reaching more than 1 million page views midway through 2009-10.

Better yet, there was no peak in sight, not only for Michigan, but other states which had tapped into WWWY and PlayOn!’s expertise and resources. 

PlayOn!, based in Atlanta, purchased the Wisconsin-based WWWY in 2012, becoming the nation’s largest rights holder and aggregator of high school content, airing more than 30,000 events annually for 34 state associations.

When the National Federation of State High School Associations sought a platform on which to launch a national network, PlayOn! Sports was a natural fit.

“When we originally looked at the creation of a national network, the question was, ‘Do we want to go the TV route or streaming route?” said Mark Koski, Director of Sports, Events and Development for the NFHS who also serves as the liaison between member state associations and PlayOn! “We realized quickly that streaming was a no-brainer. Why have just one ‘Game of the Week’ type of package on TV? Why eliminate anyone when we can open it up to all schools at any time and provide 24-hour access?”

For most state associations, the decision to join the NFHS Network was equally elementary, as most were already with PlayOn!.

When the NFHS and PlayOn! launched the NFHS Network in time for the 2013-14 school year, 28 of the 51 state associations were on board as Network members. That number now stands at 34, with four additional states contributing some content to the network. 

There are approximately 19,000 high schools in the country, and some two million events annually. Programming will not be an issue. In fact, it’s high time these events are brought before the public’s eye, in the opinion of the Federation. Two-thirds of the way through the first school year, the Network had done just that, airing more than 26,000 events.

“One of our biggest reasons for starting the Network, and a huge advantage that we enjoy over other programming, is that students who never received any type of exposure – like cross country, swimming & diving, track & field athletes –  now have that opportunity,” Koski said. “And, we stream other activities; bands, orchestras, graduations.  This is not only for fans, but for participants and families.”

With 34 states providing championship contests in various sports (the NFHS Network airs member tournament contests not under contractual obligations with other providers), the Network enjoys its heaviest traffic during tournament seasons, as the recent spike in viewership this March attested.

During the first three months of 2014 alone, the Network attracted 1.4 million unique visitors, following a successful four-month launch period last fall that attracted 1.5 million sets of eyes.

While tournaments provide the meat of the NFHS Network menu, regular-season events might well be the bread and butter. Enter the School Broadcast Program, formerly known in Michigan as the Digital Broadcast Program.

Nationally, 856 schools representing 37 states take part in the endeavor, filling a valuable role in the overall scheme of the Network.

“In several months during the school year there are  no state championships, so the School Broadcast Programs pick up the slack with quality content. Additionally, placing this many events so quickly on the Network, so effectively, has been challenging. The School Broadcast Programs have helped alleviate the workload.” Koski said.

As of April, the void between postseasons has been filled to the tune of 17,500 events from SBPs. Of those events, more than 11,500 are sporting events, which means nearly 6,000 are other school functions, from pep rallies to school plays. All of these programs are produced by students, for students, another point of pride for the Network.

“For more than a century, school sports has had the highest profile of all youth sports,” said MHSAA Executive Director Jack Roberts, who also serves as president of the NFHS Network Board of Directors. “Ours is a unique brand that stands out among all of youth sports. Done right, this network will solidify interscholastic athletics as the most popular and principled youth sports experience for many generations.”

Such an ambitious undertaking does not come without some trepidation, both philosophical and practical. Maintaining the wholesome, amateur nature of school sports while presenting the product in the most technologically professional manner was considered, as was the financial impact.

“We discussed a number of potential hurdles,” Koski said. “Was the overall idea of a network more like college and professional levels of athletics? Did we want to expose student-athletes in this manner? We decided it was time to give our students, and our product, its due.

“Another major question was how putting games onto a network affects attendance. Between 50 and 75 percent of the state high school association budgets comes from attendance.”

Thus far, Koski reports, there has been more praise than criticism, and members of the Network have not reported adverse effects on tournament or regular-season attendance. For the most part, it’s a way for interested parties who can’t get to the games to still have the ability to watch. And, that’s one of the primary goals.

In Michigan, the MHSAA faced an additional speed-bump, if not full-fledged hurdle. Tournament content in the early days of MHSAA.tv had been free. As part of the NFHS Network, the content is pay-per-view.

However, the Network “admission price” offers an unlimited content period, no matter what plan subscribers choose. So, customers can view multiple games in numerous states for one price. That would be a lot of stamps on the hand and gas mileage to physically accomplish the feat.

“We really modeled this after the Big Ten Network with kind of a NetFlix feel,” Koski said. “Our customers pay one subscription for unlimited content.”

Live events on the NFHS Network during 2013-14 cost $9.95 for 24 hours, $14.95 for 30 days and $89.95 for the school year. The season rate was $49.95, good for 120 days from the date of purchase.

“We are starting to see a trend where people lean toward the 30-day plan,” Koski added. “The Network has done a great job with the return policy. If you’re not happy, we return the money. Many times it’s that the venue doesn’t have the proper technological setup and there are hiccups. Right now we’ve seen only about 1.5% return rate. However, it is our goal to drop this below 1%.”

Another noticeable trend involves the preferred medium used to access content. PlayOn! statistics indicate that 60 percent of subscribers are watching  events via mobile devices, versus 40 percent on computers. Just a year earlier, the figures were reversed. It is, indeed, a small world after all.

Numbers at the MHSAA.tv site continue to be solid in this first year under the NFHS Network umbrella. The Network tracks its “referral” portals, that is, the sites from which most of the viewers enter the NFHS Network page; basically, which states are attracting the most viewers. Currently, the MHSAA is second to Illinois on the list, largely due to its prior relationship with PlayOn!, as well as being one of the pioneers in the industry.

“A lot of the MHSAA’s success has to do with the awareness that was built prior to joining the Network,” Koski said. “We’re excited that the top two states are Illinois and Michigan, because that speaks loudly for the future. Having had prior agreements with PlayOn! clearly gave them an advantage as far as awareness. Two, three, four years from now, we’d expect that those states now with us that were not previously part of PlayOn! will achieve similar numbers once their followers and the casual fan grow accustomed to watching school sports in this manner. It’s all exciting, and we all want immediate results, but we’ve got to have some patience.  It took ESPN a number of years to be known as ESPN.”

Ultimately, the popularity of the Network could result in attractive sponsorship opportunities for corporate partners, which in turn would provide additional revenue for member state associations. Currently, Network members receive a rights fee for content provided.

“We’ve made strides by leaps and bounds so far, and believe we’ve built a platform on which to display the great things students are doing, while delivering our mission and perspective,” Koski said. “And, the more funding we can generate, the better off we can assist our schools.”

An age-old school assignment lies ahead for Koski and the Network: report on what they did during summer vacation.

“The immediate challenge is to find content for outside of the school season,” Koski said. “What do we show after June state championships, and in July and August. Maybe some archived items is the ticket. How special would it be for people to have access to events from when they participated in school sports and performing arts to enhance viewership?”

In the Eyes of the Beholder

Courtney Hawkins has spent his share of time in the dark.

A 1992 graduate of Michigan State University where he was an All-Big Ten wide receiver, Hawkins went on to play nine seasons in the NFL with Tampa Bay and Pittsburgh. To say he’s watched his share of football video is an understatement.

“At MSU we had about an hour pre-practice film session, then a post-practice film session. Then we were encouraged  to watch extra film, so we’d log about three or four hours of film per day in college,” recalled Hawkins, now back at his high school alma mater Flint Beecher as the athletic director and head football coach.

“At the professional level, we literally sat in the dark from maybe 7 a.m. until lunch time, then were on the field for a couple hours, showered up and went back in film session. So, you’d watch film for seven to nine hours a day, and I’d get home at 6 or 7 o’clock. People see the three hours you’re out there on Sunday, but, man, in terms of hours, it’s a job like G.M.,” he said.

Back at the place where Hawkins honed his skills, the game remains the same, but video access has changed drastically. At the high school level, it’s also not the students’ job. There are academics to consider, in addition to just letting kids be kids.

“What I’ve found in high school is, kids don’t know how to watch film,” Hawkins said. “What’s easiest for me is I’ll take clips of opponents – 12, maybe 20 – whatever I think there bread-and-butter is, and hammer that to our kids. In a room full of 16-to-18- year-olds it would take hours to watch an entire game. We try to get kids home at the proper time to do chores, homework, or go to other activities.”

With the access to an abundance of video literally at the palms of their hands, it is important to realize that these are high school students and encourage them to curtail some of their enthusiasm toward the technology.

“I wonder if all this video watching/reviewing is taking some of the fun out of HS sports,” said Randy Heethuis, Hudsonville Unity Christian boys and girls soccer coach. “I believe there is a fine line between educational athletics where video can be used to educate and the overuse where high school athletes spend hours watching video each week even during the school day. When high school athletes stop enjoying the experience, or their sport feels like work rather than fun, we as coaches have pushed them over that line.”

Lest one think Heethuis is not competitive, it should be noted that his girls program has won seven of the last nine MHSAA Championships, and the boys won titles in 2007, 2009 and 2012.

Ditto Nick Archer, whose East Lansing boys soccer team has captured three MHSAA titles in the last dozen years, including last fall.

“I try to keep it in balance. We’ve gone from the ‘70s when we had nothing, to now when we can know too much,” said Archer, in his 38th year as a head coach. “In soccer, with the PKs (penalty kicks) you can find tendencies and strengths. People can build up quite a databank, and we have done that, too.

“But you’ve got to know when enough’s enough. Sometimes it is too much,” Archer adds. “I’m more concerned about my team. We don’t really change what we do, it’s just a matter of being aware of what our opponent might do and being prepared for it. You have to remain true to who your team is and what you do well.”

Hawkins and his staff remind their players of that fact on a daily basis during the season. Players are going to watch games on their own and develop expectations, both positive and negative. Often times, today’s coaches have to de-program their players.

“What we sometimes fight here is our kids will find the video of the next opponent and say such and such isn’t that good; ‘we’re gonna blow through them coach.’” Hawkins said. “It creates a mindset that as a coach I’m trying to stamp out. It can set kids up for letdown, or on the other hand they see a team that looks better than they really are against  a lesser opponent, and they get intimidated. As coaches, we have to provide an even keel.”

With proper supervision and balance, positive results are attainable.

“Video does give you a certain comfort zone or a handle on your opponents. You can see that maybe their guys are all 6-foot-8, or find out who their top scorers are,” said Archer. “Our team is sometimes better prepared than we have been in the past when we go against schools we don’t know. The bottom line is, the game certainly has changed and you either adapt or get left behind.”

As the games on the field and the courts have evolved and in many ways become more sophisticated over the years, technology changes on a daily basis. The pluses and minuses of its effect on sports can be debated, but improvements in quality and ease of use are crystal clear.

“With the new editing systems, you can email kids clips,” Hawkins said. “They’re clicking away no matter what, whether it’s YouTube, hudl, whatever, so I prefer that they watch what I send them. I am a firm believer in leading the kids. You lead them, or they’ll find it on their own.”

Or, worse, they’ll watch with others, who can run the gamut from well-intentioned to misguided to those with their own agendas. Remember, it’s just as easy for parents, fans, classmates and coaches of non-school teams to download a team’s most recent performance.

“One concern I have with all this video being available online is, how many other ‘coaches’ are the athletes watching it with and what mixed messages are athletes receiving?” said Heethuis. “This has the potential to lead to more confusion on the part of the athlete, and that's probably not good for anybody.”

Hawkins understands the role of parents and appreciates those who study the game with great interest. To properly evaluate video and critique performance, however, the viewer must have knowledge of the game plan and each player’s assignment on given plays.

“On the outside looking in, you may see what you think you see, but a kid might be making a mistake. If parents are adamant I invite them to come in and watch film with me and we’ll evaluate it together,” Hawkins said. “Watching video is like looking at art. Everyone can interpret a painting differently until they sit down with the artist who explains it and they say, ‘OK, I see it now.’”

If viewing and sharing video is more convenient, then actually seeing the images in the video has never been better. Most devices can record and play in HD, making it easier for coaches and players to identify uniform numbers, formations and positioning.

“The quality now allows you to get a good look at personnel and numbers. With VHS tapes, you couldn’t always see what number the left tackle was. It also cuts down on the time it takes to search back and forth through the old tapes,” Hawkins said.

The variety of platforms available also offers viewing alternatives in cases where some video is sub-standard, and makes it likely that game footage can almost always be found.

“Most of our video comes from MHSAA.tv, YouTube or MLive, or we share video. We are familiar with hudl, and more and more soccer teams are using that,” Archer said. “It’s been most beneficial for us during tournament time, but we always have someone physically there to scout during the tournament, too.”

The hudl website, with deep roots in the sport of football, has become the “go-to” site for most schools and conferences, and is a burgeoning evaluation and training tool among officials.

“Within the last two years, we haven’t played a team that’s not on hudl or some kind of editing site,” Hawkins said. “And, I’ve noticed that the video is almost always in hi-def, because the equipment is a lot more affordable.”

Due to budget constraints, Hawkins has his own personal camera and hires a friend to record Beecher’s games. He hopes to experiment with an end zone camera next season to provide additional views. He explains that keeping up with available technology is a necessity to “even the field.”

Depending on a number of factors, including video personnel, quality of the footage, frequency of postings and creative editing, video creates a smaller world, if not always an ideal world.

“A lot depends on the person recording the games. Some get too close to the play rather than following the development or sequence,” said Archer, who benefits from a designated parent videographer and a student from the School Broadcast Program at each contest. “Also, we use hi-def, and some schools don’t. The technology certainly is there to get high-quality video if you want it.”

At times, creative editing can eliminate portions of contests which schools upload to the web.

Dan Flynn, longtime head football coach at Escanaba High School, and more recently an assistant at Marquette, calls it the “hot dog illusion.”

“We use hudl, and what you have to remember is, it’s only as good as the users. All of the online video and new technology hasn’t changed one important thing: some coaches aren’t going to show you some plays,” Flynn warns. “We call it the ‘hot dog illusion,’ where a series of plays is missing and all of a sudden the score changes. The opposing school says, ‘We don’t know what happened to it.’ Well, I guess the kid shooting it must have gone and got a hot dog; the hot dog illusion.”

After Further Review

Just reading the words above yields a Pavlovian response in the football world. Conversations cease, posteriors inch forward on chairs, torsos bend toward TVs. All in anticipation of decisions which follow the three most magnetic words of autumn Sunday services: “After further review.”

Ironically, the oft-maligned individuals who deliver the subsequent verdicts very often log more video hours than the player who just did/did not stay in bounds or did/did not fumble.

Game officials are passionate students of the games they officiate, and video sessions have become vital to preparation and advancement. As with coaches and athletes, accessibility to such resources has never been more plentiful for officials at all levels of our games.

The boom has occurred at such a meteoric rate that it’s difficult to imagine life without video.

“When I was just beginning, it was pretty rare to have video of yourself,” said Meghan Joseph, a Capital Area Officials Association member who now works NCAA basketball. “Before online video, you’d have to watch games on TV and emulate what those officials would do and incorporate it into your game.”

Oh, by the way, Joseph just turned 30 and was the youngest NCAA Division I Women’s Basketball official when she received her first assignment at that level eight years ago. We’re not exactly talking “good old days” here, but eight years in the technological realm can seem like a lifetime.

Today’s newer contest officials are among the most ardent beneficiaries of hi-tech devices and continual change. It’s what they grew up with. Now, they have the ability to apply all of it to an avocation they love.

Dave Uyl, a former professional baseball umpire who now works NCAA Division I baseball and Division III football, spent a year-and-a-half as an Associate Editor for Referee Magazine, the monthly Holy Grail for officials nationwide.

“Just during my time there, we noticed a great increase in the number of high school officials associations using video on a regular basis at their meetings,” noted Uyl. “Without a doubt, the best meetings are those in which video is incorporated. It is so much more valuable to be able to break down plays and evaluate mechanics on the screen. It’s one thing to read a rules book, but another to be able to look at plays.”

The Genesee County Coaches and Officials Association is one of the MHSAA Approved Associations at the forefront of the video vortex.

“We use a lot of video in our training.  We can take examples and break them down at any speed we wish and present that to the group.  We find that it keeps the attention span of our officials much better if they are visually engaged at our meetings instead of just listening to lectures,” said Steve Tannar, who has been to his share of meetings with the Genesee group as a five-sport official.

Jeremy Valentine, football officials coordinator for the MHSAA’s Southeastern Conference and a five-sport official himself for the Huron Valley Officials Association, has noticed that the effects of video can vary amongst officials.

“The ability to watch yourself on film has been very helpful to a number of officials at a variety of experience levels,” Valentine said. “However, some officials may be intimidated to watch themselves on film for fear of what they may actually see.”

Tannar offers an alternative for those who might be camera-shy, but adds that the road to improvement – as in any endeavor – is to make mistakes and recognize them; whether alone, or in front of a group of peers.

“We typically don't use a ton of our own people in video presentations,” Tannar said. “We prefer not to put our guys on the spot, so anonymous video works best for us.  That doesn't mean we never do it though. I've been up on the big screen for the whole room to see. Nothing wrong with a little humility from time to time.”

In the Capital Area Officials Association, nearly all of the video shown at its meetings involve member officials. Dan Renner has taken the reins of the video program during football season through hudl.com. Area schools post their contests to hudl, and Renner alerts CAOA members when new clips and games are online for review.

“Before hudl, we’d get six or seven DVDs per season from officials who were off on a given night and then went to shoot a game,” Renner said. “It’s amazing how quickly some of the games are up and posted now. We use it as a tool. We historically know what types of offenses  schools in the area run, but for nonconference games it gives us an idea what those schools run, so we can pregame a bit better.

“You just have to understand that in an immediate-feedback world, if you boot a call during a game, you’ll come to the next association meeting and everyone has seen it and everyone knows. Film doesn’t lie, and you are putting yourself out there each time you go out.”

Eric Wills, Jr., like Renner, is a young official who just completed his first year at the NCAA Division III level. He has no doubt that his exposure to video, lots of it, accelerated his path.

“Sites like hudl really help young officials see snaps and get experience,” Wills said. “I watch my pre-snap keys, break down my zone, observe the dead ball officiating. Video allows us to get reps just by watching more snaps. I spend about two to two-and-half hours a week watching film and discussing it with other officials. Fellow officials are our best critics, and that’s how we get better.”

In an avocation that calls for confidence, knowledge, patience and physical and mental stamina, humility can be overshadowed by ego. That’s why it’s important to keep the big picture in mind while looking at the smaller pictures on today’s many devices, says Uyl, who worked four seasons at the Triple A level and two MLB Spring Training seasons in Arizona during his professional days.

“The important thing to remember is that you’re one crew. At the end of the day, the objective is to get it right. You can’t have hurt feelings about having a call overturned, and you can’t be afraid to look at a replay and overturn it. It ain’t called ‘Show Friends,’ it’s called ‘Show Business.’ This is a business,” said Uyl, who still has friends in Major League Baseball.

Video has moved from training sessions to the rules books, with MLB becoming the last major sport to incorporate replay provisions.

This year, Uyl and Valentine both will feel the on-field presence of cameras and replays during the fall. Like Uyl, Valentine is a college football official, working Division I FCS in the Pioneer League and Division II, where he worked the 2013 National Championship game. The targeting penalty was implemented for NCAA Division I play last year and now has reviewable components in place for Divisions II and III.

Joseph, meanwhile, already has experience with monitor reviews at the collegiate basketball level.

“We have rules in place for certain situations throughout the contest where we are required to go to the monitors,” Joseph said. “There is certainly less room for interpretation or judgment, but on the other hand there is a whole new set of rules dealing with monitor review. From a fan’s perspective, many think we go to the monitor when we feel like it, when really there are certain situations that we have to go to the monitor. That gets magnified in the last minute of a close contest, which is often the only part that fans remember.”

Cameras also can have an effect on games even before plays get to the review stage. The human element of officiating still remains, but in different ways.

“In Triple A ball and the Arizona Fall League, we had QuesTec (used by Major League Baseball in the early 2000s for purposes of providing feedback and evaluation of Major League umpires), and after every game you’d leave with a disc and a score on it,” Uyl said. “Video doesn’t lie. It’s an evaluation tool, and it’s here to stay. You kind of start officiating to the video; certainly we see that in football with all the replay at the collegiate and professional levels.”

In the MHSAA, replay use is limited to a select few scenarios. For both genders of the MHSAA Basketball Semifinals and Finals, officials may use the courtside monitor to determine whether an attempt is good or no good, or whether it is a 2-point goal or 3-point goal, only when the clock reads 0:00 at the end of a game. Ice hockey began to employ a similar system in 2011 for its Semifinals and Finals, only reviewing “puck crosses the line/beats the clock” scenarios.

Is there more to come? Valentine believes that with new targeting rules now in place for high school football, perhaps a halftime review similar to Division II and III collegiate levels could be helpful in determining if an innocent player could be returned to action.

“I can see a similar place in high school sports for these types of scenarios,” said Valentine. “It would also be helpful to allow the officials to use video following the contest to determine which players may have been involved in flagrant acts during the game, or to also reinstate players that may have been incorrectly ejected (for example, No. 12 was ejected for fighting when No. 15 was actually the player involved).”

Yet, high school athletics remain educational in nature, and some of the lessons include mistakes and consequences made by the game’s arbiters.

“Sports have survived for a long time with no replay and an occasional officiating mistake,” Tannar said. “I think part of the lesson an athlete can learn about life from sports is how to persevere when things don't go their way. Officials will make mistakes and players – and coaches, fans, etc. – have to learn how to overcome those obstacles because life is full of them.”

Video has certainly added a new means by which people are able to capture officiating mistakes. Often times, the officials are exonerated by the tales of the tape. In either case, class is always in session today.

“We watch clips in the locker room after games as a crew. If we see something we think was questionable, we can send it to our supervisor with an explanation,” Joseph said. “A coach can also send a clip to our video coordinator, who will send us a copy. If further conversation is needed, the supervisor, video coordinator and officiating crew might have a conference call. There is definitely more accountability with video.”

At the high school level, while most coaches are glad to assist in officials’ quest for improvement, some remain reluctant to share video – until a call is perceived to go against them.

“For the most part, the coaches thought it was great that we wanted to continuously improve,” said Renner. “There are a few schools that don’t want to share the video and are afraid with hudl it’s just a couple clicks away. Well, if you think about it, every game on Saturday and Sunday can be recorded by millions of people through basic cable with DVR.”

To be sure, no matter how protective some folks try to be, video of almost anything, anytime, is out there, waiting for more sets of eyes.

It’s easily accessible for millions of people, and easily generated and posted by millions more. That dynamic makes officials easy targets for second-guessing, but shouldn’t change how they approach their unenviable task on a daily or nightly basis.

“Pretty much every one of our meetings involves some mention of social media and the fact that we are always being recorded,” said Tannar. “I don't think about it when I'm on the court or field,  but you do need to be aware that anything you do will be captured, reproduced, traded, sent, emailed and posted, so don't give them a chance to catch you doing something you shouldn't. Don't address the fans, remain calm when talking to coaches and be the smartest ones in the room with the rules so you always have book support.”

Valentine agrees that nothing beats being prepared, and also advises fellow officials to stick to officiating and leave the social media to others.

“If you go onto the field every day with the knowledge that someone may always be 'watching,' there is no need to worry about who may or may not be recording you with a mobile device,” Valentine said. “I have a bigger fear with what officials may post on social media forums following games.”

PHOTOS: (Top) Students at Michigan State University's Breslin Center film during the MHSAA Basketball Finals. (Middle) Courtney Hawkins has returned to Flint Beecher as its football coach and athletic director. (Below) Meghan Joseph began officiating Division I college basketball games during her early 20s.