New Math: Division & Multiplication Problems

July 25, 2017

By Jack Roberts
MHSAA Executive Director 

This is the second part in a series on MHSAA tournament classification, past and present, that will be published over the next two weeks. This series originally ran in this spring's edition of MHSAA benchmarks.

High school tournament classifications went viral before there was social media and most of us knew what “viral” meant.

Much as a virus infects computers today or has created epidemics of disease around the world for centuries, high school tournament classification – once introduced – tends to spread uncontrollably. Once started, it tends to keep expanding and rarely contracts.

While we are still some distance from providing every team a trophy as a result of expanding high school tournament classification across the country, there is criticism nevertheless that we are headed in that direction – a philosophy which is supposed to exist only in local youth sports for our youngest children.

Michigan could be blamed for all this. Michigan is generally accepted as the first state to provide different classifications for season-ending tournaments for different sized schools. It started a century ago. Today, every state has various classifications for its tournaments in most if not all sports. And it is a bit ironic that Michigan – creator of the classification chaos – more than most other states has kept the number of tournament classes or divisions under control.

Yes, there is evidence that tournament classifications have expanded over the years in Michigan, especially with the relatively recent introduction of tournaments in football and the late 1990s’ move from classes to divisions in most MHSAA tournaments. But the MHSAA Representative Council has held true to its word when it expanded the playoffs for football from four classes to eight divisions: this is needed because of unique factors of football, factors that exist in no other sport; and all other sports should be capped at a maximum of four classes or divisions.

Kentucky is the preeminent defender of single-class basketball. All of its 276 high schools compete for the single state championship for each gender. In Indiana, there are still open wounds from its move in 1998 from one to four classes for its 400 schools in basketball.

Multi-class tournaments have tended to increase the number of non-public school champions, which some states are trying to lower through enrollment “multipliers,” and also tend to increase the number of repeat champions, which some states are trying to affect with “success factors” which lift smaller schools into classifications for larger schools if they take home too many trophies.

While there is considerable evidence that state tournaments do as much bad as good for educational athletics, state associations persist in providing postseason tournaments because, on balance, the experiences are supposed to be good for student-athletes. And once we reach that conclusion it is just a small leap to believe that if the tournaments are good for a few, they must be better for more – which leads to creating more and more tournament classifications. One becomes two classes, then three, then four and so forth.

While the argument is that more classifications or divisions provides more students with opportunities to compete and win, it is undeniable that the experience changes as the number of tournament classifications expands. It is not possible for state associations to provide the same level of support when tournament classifications expand to multiple venues playing simultaneously. For example, there is less audio and video broadcast potential at each venue, and less media coverage to each venue. Focus is diluted and fans diminished at each championship.

No one can argue reasonably that today's two-day MHSAA Football Finals of eight championship games has the same pizazz as the one-day, four-games event conducted prior to 1990.

In some states the number of divisions has grown so much that it is difficult to see much difference between the many season-ending state championship games and a regular-season event in the same sport.

It is a balancing act. And Michigan has been studying that balance longer than any other state, and charting a steadier course than most.

Addition by Division

The shift to Divisions for MHSAA Tournament play in numerous sports has added up to a greater number of champions for teams and individuals across the state. Following are the sports currently employing a divisional format, and the procedures for determining enrollment and classification. 

In 23 statewide or Lower Peninsula tournaments, schools which sponsor the sport are currently divided into nearly equal divisions. They are:

  • Baseball - 4 Divisions
  • Boys Bowling - 4 Divisions            
  • Girls Bowling - 4 Divisions
  • Girls Competitive Cheer - 4 Divisions
  • LP Boys Cross Country - 4 Divisions
  • LP Girls Cross Country - 4 Divisions
  • LP Boys Golf - 4 Divisions
  • LP Girls Golf - 4 Divisions
  • Ice Hockey - 3 Divisions
  • Boys Lacrosse - 2 Divisions
  • Girls Lacrosse - 2 Divisions
  • Boys Skiing - 2 Divisions
  • Girls Skiing - 2 Divisions
  • LP Boys Soccer - 4 Divisions LP
  • Girls Soccer - 4 Divisions
  • Girls Softball - 4 Divisions
  • LP Boys Swimming & Diving - 3 Divisions
  • LP Girls Swimming & Diving - 3 Divisions
  • LP Boys Tennis - 4 Divisions
  • LP Girls Tennis - 4 Divisions
  • LP Boys Track & Field - 4 Divisions
  • LP Girls Track & Field - 4 Divisions
  • Wrestling - 4 Divisions

Lists of schools for each division of these 23 tournaments are posted on MHSAA.com approximately April 1. Listings of schools in Upper Peninsula tournaments for their sports are also posted on MHSAA.com. The lists are based on school memberships and sports sponsorships in effect or anticipated for the following school year, as known to the MHSAA office as of a date in early March.

In football, the 256 schools which qualify for MHSAA 11-player playoffs are placed in eight equal divisions annually on Selection Sunday. Beginning in 2017, the 8-player divisions will be determined in a like manner on Selection Sunday as well, with 32 qualifying schools placed in two divisions.

Schools have the option to play in any higher division in one or more sports for a minimum of two years.

The deadlines for "opt-ups" are as follows:

  • Applications for fall sports must be submitted by April 15
  • Applications for winter sports must be submitted by Aug. 15
  • Applications for spring sports must be submitted by Oct. 15

Subsequent to the date of these postings for these tournaments, no school will have its division raised or lowered by schools opening or closing, schools adding or dropping sports, schools exercising the option to play in a higher division, or approval or dissolution of cooperative programs.

When the same sport is conducted for boys and girls in the same season (e.g., track & field and cross country), the gender that has the most sponsoring schools controls the division breaks for both genders.

Past Close Calls Pay Off Big as Hartland Goes Extras to Clinch Comeback Win

By Dean Holzwarth
Special for MHSAA.com

June 14, 2025

EAST LANSING –  The Hartland baseball had been accustomed to playing in close games throughout the MHSAA Tournament.

So when Saturday’s Division 1 Final against Macomb Dakota went to extra innings, the Eagles weren’t fazed by the moment. 

Hartland pulled out a dramatic 5-3 victory in nine innings in a game that lasted nearly three hours.

The Eagles clinched their first Final since 2015 by scoring two runs in the top of the ninth.

Hartland won four straight games by one run during this playoff run and also won by two runs in the Semifinal against Grosse Pointe South. 

“The close games definitely helped us with our mindset,” said junior Logan Randall, who pitched the final four innings and allowed only one earned run and two hits.

“Whenever times came tough during this game, we all knew what to do because we’ve been used to it. It’s happened five games in a row. We adapted and knew that anything could happen. Every playoff game had been back and forth, and we knew we could come out on top if we gave it our all.”

Hartland coach Brad Guenther said his team wasn’t always good at eking out the tight ones during the season.  

“I’m super proud of them, but it’s something that wasn't our strength through the middle of the year,” he said. “We lost a lot of close games with a lot of new guys playing, but being in tough spots where we had to get out of jams kind of put us on this run and catapulted us.

Eagles players celebrate after Max Rector (2) scores.“We gave up eight runs in seven games, and there were a lot of jams that they were in so we had to be good in those moments. We failed a lot in those moments too, but we were able to respond and execute when we needed to.”

Hartland (28-15-1) trailed 2-0 after the first inning, but rallied to tie it in the third. 

In the top of the ninth, senior Michael Zielinksi laced a single to right field that was misplayed and allowed the go-ahead run to score. 

“I was just trying to do my job,” Zielinksi said. “I was expecting to go up there and lay a bunt down, but he let me swing away and I was seeing the ball well all day. I got the barrel to it and hit it to right field, and the guy made a little mistake and we capitalized on it.”

Senior Roman Forcia followed with a sacrifice fly to give the Eagles a two-run lead.

“We knew they were a good team, and we knew they were going to come out strong and they did,” Zielinski said. “We had faith in each other, and everyone in that dugout knew we were going to find a way and we did.”

Both teams had opportunities to score in the sixth inning, but the score remained tied after both teams came up empty. 

Hartland took a brief lead in the top of the eighth on a sacrifice fly by Randall, but the Cougars responded in the bottom of the inning with an RBI single from Jadon Ford to even it at 3-3.

“It’s pretty surreal right now,” Guenther said. “A lot of guys in our dugout were probably the only ones who really thought we had a chance to make a run and we could win these games like this. We were not the favorites along the way, but coming together and doing something special like that – these guys will never forget that.”

Top-ranked Dakota (36-7-1), which was searching for its first Finals championship, was plagued by missed opportunities and four errors.

“Both teams kept fighting, and both teams played hard,” Cougars coach Angelo Plouffe said. “They got a few more hits and we made a few more mistakes than they did, and it's the name of the game right there.

“I think they deserved it. They did it when they needed to and we didn’t, but I’m very proud of my guys and all my seniors because they got us here.” 

Click for the full box score.

PHOTOS (Top) Hartland’s Michael Zielinski, sliding, is called safe at home during his team’s ninth-inning rally Saturday. (Middle) Eagles players celebrate after Max Rector (2) scores.