New Math: Division & Multiplication Problems
July 25, 2017
By Jack Roberts
MHSAA Executive Director
This is the second part in a series on MHSAA tournament classification, past and present, that will be published over the next two weeks. This series originally ran in this spring's edition of MHSAA benchmarks.
High school tournament classifications went viral before there was social media and most of us knew what “viral” meant.
Much as a virus infects computers today or has created epidemics of disease around the world for centuries, high school tournament classification – once introduced – tends to spread uncontrollably. Once started, it tends to keep expanding and rarely contracts.
While we are still some distance from providing every team a trophy as a result of expanding high school tournament classification across the country, there is criticism nevertheless that we are headed in that direction – a philosophy which is supposed to exist only in local youth sports for our youngest children.
Michigan could be blamed for all this. Michigan is generally accepted as the first state to provide different classifications for season-ending tournaments for different sized schools. It started a century ago. Today, every state has various classifications for its tournaments in most if not all sports. And it is a bit ironic that Michigan – creator of the classification chaos – more than most other states has kept the number of tournament classes or divisions under control.
Yes, there is evidence that tournament classifications have expanded over the years in Michigan, especially with the relatively recent introduction of tournaments in football and the late 1990s’ move from classes to divisions in most MHSAA tournaments. But the MHSAA Representative Council has held true to its word when it expanded the playoffs for football from four classes to eight divisions: this is needed because of unique factors of football, factors that exist in no other sport; and all other sports should be capped at a maximum of four classes or divisions.
Kentucky is the preeminent defender of single-class basketball. All of its 276 high schools compete for the single state championship for each gender. In Indiana, there are still open wounds from its move in 1998 from one to four classes for its 400 schools in basketball.
Multi-class tournaments have tended to increase the number of non-public school champions, which some states are trying to lower through enrollment “multipliers,” and also tend to increase the number of repeat champions, which some states are trying to affect with “success factors” which lift smaller schools into classifications for larger schools if they take home too many trophies.
While there is considerable evidence that state tournaments do as much bad as good for educational athletics, state associations persist in providing postseason tournaments because, on balance, the experiences are supposed to be good for student-athletes. And once we reach that conclusion it is just a small leap to believe that if the tournaments are good for a few, they must be better for more – which leads to creating more and more tournament classifications. One becomes two classes, then three, then four and so forth.
While the argument is that more classifications or divisions provides more students with opportunities to compete and win, it is undeniable that the experience changes as the number of tournament classifications expands. It is not possible for state associations to provide the same level of support when tournament classifications expand to multiple venues playing simultaneously. For example, there is less audio and video broadcast potential at each venue, and less media coverage to each venue. Focus is diluted and fans diminished at each championship.
No one can argue reasonably that today's two-day MHSAA Football Finals of eight championship games has the same pizazz as the one-day, four-games event conducted prior to 1990.
In some states the number of divisions has grown so much that it is difficult to see much difference between the many season-ending state championship games and a regular-season event in the same sport.
It is a balancing act. And Michigan has been studying that balance longer than any other state, and charting a steadier course than most.
Addition by Division
The shift to Divisions for MHSAA Tournament play in numerous sports has added up to a greater number of champions for teams and individuals across the state. Following are the sports currently employing a divisional format, and the procedures for determining enrollment and classification.
In 23 statewide or Lower Peninsula tournaments, schools which sponsor the sport are currently divided into nearly equal divisions. They are:
- Baseball - 4 Divisions
- Boys Bowling - 4 Divisions
- Girls Bowling - 4 Divisions
- Girls Competitive Cheer - 4 Divisions
- LP Boys Cross Country - 4 Divisions
- LP Girls Cross Country - 4 Divisions
- LP Boys Golf - 4 Divisions
- LP Girls Golf - 4 Divisions
- Ice Hockey - 3 Divisions
- Boys Lacrosse - 2 Divisions
- Girls Lacrosse - 2 Divisions
- Boys Skiing - 2 Divisions
- Girls Skiing - 2 Divisions
- LP Boys Soccer - 4 Divisions LP
- Girls Soccer - 4 Divisions
- Girls Softball - 4 Divisions
- LP Boys Swimming & Diving - 3 Divisions
- LP Girls Swimming & Diving - 3 Divisions
- LP Boys Tennis - 4 Divisions
- LP Girls Tennis - 4 Divisions
- LP Boys Track & Field - 4 Divisions
- LP Girls Track & Field - 4 Divisions
- Wrestling - 4 Divisions
Lists of schools for each division of these 23 tournaments are posted on MHSAA.com approximately April 1. Listings of schools in Upper Peninsula tournaments for their sports are also posted on MHSAA.com. The lists are based on school memberships and sports sponsorships in effect or anticipated for the following school year, as known to the MHSAA office as of a date in early March.
In football, the 256 schools which qualify for MHSAA 11-player playoffs are placed in eight equal divisions annually on Selection Sunday. Beginning in 2017, the 8-player divisions will be determined in a like manner on Selection Sunday as well, with 32 qualifying schools placed in two divisions.
Schools have the option to play in any higher division in one or more sports for a minimum of two years.
The deadlines for "opt-ups" are as follows:
- Applications for fall sports must be submitted by April 15
- Applications for winter sports must be submitted by Aug. 15
- Applications for spring sports must be submitted by Oct. 15
Subsequent to the date of these postings for these tournaments, no school will have its division raised or lowered by schools opening or closing, schools adding or dropping sports, schools exercising the option to play in a higher division, or approval or dissolution of cooperative programs.
When the same sport is conducted for boys and girls in the same season (e.g., track & field and cross country), the gender that has the most sponsoring schools controls the division breaks for both genders.
Block Party: 2026 Girls Volleyball Regional Preview
By
Geoff Kimmerly
MHSAA.com senior editor
November 9, 2026
Matchups anticipated all season long decided Girls Volleyball District championships all over the state last week – and the intensity only ramps up from here for the 128 teams that have advanced to this next round.
Regional Semifinals in all four divisions will be played Tuesday and Regional Finals on Thursday. Links to interactive brackets plus information on purchasing tickets are available on the Girls Volleyball page, and a list version of this week’s slate is posted on the Scores page – with green TV icons linked to broadcasts on the NFHS Network.
See below for glances at District Finals that caused some of the loudest statewide buzz, and quick previews of three Regionals in each division that could provide the most talked-about highlights in the days ahead. Records, results and schedules below are those posted for teams on MHSAA.com, and rankings reflect polls posted by the Michigan Interscholastic Volleyball Coaches Association (MIVCA).
Week in Review
The countdown of last week’s five most intriguing results:
1. Rockford d. Grand Rapids Forest Hills Northern (25-18, 29-27, 25-22) It was only a matter of time before the Rams (19-21) returned to their traditional spot among the Division 1 elite, and it’s fair to say they arrived with this District-clinching win over No. 7 FHN (35-14-1) on Saturday after advancing with a 3-1 victory over honorable mention Lowell.
2. Buckley d. Traverse City Christian (23-25, 25-23, 25-22, 23-25, 15-10) The Bears (32-9) flew under the radar a bit most of the season, cracking the honorable mention list right before the start of the playoffs, but they made a loud statement with this Division 4 District Final win over No. 3 TCC (38-9).
3. Clinton d. Grass Lake (25-23, 25-19, 26-28, 25-13) These two Division 3 contenders played a few monster sets across their two matches over the last three weeks, and this time No. 7 Clinton (39-9-1) came back from dropping one to avenge its Oct. 22 defeat by the No. 5 Warriors (28-6-3).
4. Chelsea d. Tecumseh (14-25, 25-20, 21-25, 25-19, 20-18) Twice the unranked Bulldogs (15-10-3) came back after losing a set to emerge with the Division 2 District-clinching win in five, after losing twice to honorable mention Tecumseh (35-9-2) during the regular season.
5. Holland Christian d. Grand Rapids South Christian (18-25, 25-20, 25-16, 25-22) No. 8-ranked South Christian (27-8) had won their lone regular-season meeting, but after losing the first set Holland Christian (22-10-1) came back to clinch a Division 2 District title.
Regionals at a Glance
These could be among our most competitive brackets. Host sites are in bold.
DIVISION 1
Bloomfield Hills Marian
Bloomfield Hills Marian (40-5) vs. Grosse Pointe South (8-27-2)
Detroit Renaissance (29-2-2) vs. Farmington Hills Mercy (28-3)
Renaissance claimed its first District title since 2019, and GPS came back from a tough regular season to advance to Regionals for the 13th straight season. They will try to break up an expected rematch of top-ranked Mercy and No. 2 Marian, who have played four times this season – Mercy with a 3-1 edge including winning their most recent meeting Oct. 24.
Holland West Ottawa
Hudsonville (36-5) vs. Rockford (19-21)
East Grand Rapids (27-9-1) vs. Grand Haven (32-11-1)
As noted above, Rockford has become a dangerous team – so despite losing twice previously to Hudsonville, including in their regular-season finale, the Rams can’t be overlooked. That said, Hudsonville’s losses all came to ranked opponents, and they picked up a pair of wins apiece against No. 10 Grand Haven and honorable mention East Grand Rapids along the way. EGR and the Bucs are seeing each other for the first time this fall.
Lake Orion
South Lyon East (39-7) vs. Clarkston (27-4-1)
Bloomfield Hills (33-11) vs. Brighton (28-10-1)
Clarkston and Bloomfield Hills both have won a Regional title over the last three seasons, while Brighton is seeking its first since 2001 and South Lyon East its first ever. Clarkston has wins over all three teams in this field but did lose a rematch to Bloomfield Hills on Oct. 17. All four of the Wolves’ losses came to ranked opponents, but the other three also have plenty of momentum: East has won 10 of its last 11 matches, Brighton 13 of its last 14 and Bloomfield Hills nine of its last 12.
DIVISION 2
Clio
Essexville Garber (35-15-5) vs. North Branch (39-9-3)
Frankenmuth (33-4) vs. Alma (35-11)
There is plenty of familiarity here with honorable mention Garber, No. 4 Frankenmuth and Alma all from the Tri-Valley Conference Red and No. 5 North Branch formerly of that league but also a regular at this stage of the tournament (and beyond). While the Broncos lost in their Regional Final last season, they’re seeking a fifth trip to the Quarterfinals over the last six years. North Branch has played, and defeated, several ranked opponents, but Garber did win their lone matchup, Sept. 19. The Dukes also downed Alma twice but lost their lone match with Frankenmuth in four sets. The Eagles’ only losses this season came against Division 1 opponents, but they saw their 2025 run ended by Garber in a Regional Semifinal.
Dearborn
Flat Rock (28-9-1) vs. Dearborn Divine Child (26-6)
Dearborn Heights Robichaud (11-5-1) vs. Ann Arbor Father Gabriel Richard (34-6-2)
Entering the postseason ranked No. 10, Divine Child is a sensible favorite this week. The Falcons have a pair of wins over honorable mention and league rival FGR and overall have only two losses since the start of September. But honorable mention Flat Rock was last season’s Division 2 runner-up and is riding a 10-match winning streak. FGR has won eight of its 10 matches since falling to Divine Child a second time, and both of those matches against the Falcons went five sets. And Robichaud enters with one of the postseason’s best stories, as the Bulldogs won a District title for the first time.
Plainwell
Holland Christian (22-10-1) vs. Edwardsburg (29-6)
Plainwell (18-20-1) vs. Grand Rapids Christian (29-7)
Top-ranked Grand Rapids Christian has reached the Semifinals at Kellogg Arena three of the last five seasons. The Eagles took over the top spot in the poll this fall at the end of August and never relinquished it, and all seven of their losses were to Division 1 teams – six to opponents ranked among the top eight entering the playoffs. But all three possible opponents this week have had success against teams in the polls. Plainwell avenged a loss to honorable mention Otsego from just two weeks prior on the way to winning its District. As noted above, Holland Christian got here with the win over South Christian, which was ranked No. 2 for most of September. Edwardsburg closed the regular season with wins over Division 1 honorable mentions Battle Creek Lakeview and Orchard Lake St. Mary’s.
DIVISION 3
Farwell
McBain (25-16-2) vs. Beal City (21-11-6)
Roscommon (40-9-5) vs. Hart (30-12-3)
Roscommon is the top-ranked team in this division, and its only losses over the last six weeks have come to ranked Division 1 and 2 opponents. But this week should provide plenty of challenges as McBain and Beal City were honorable mentions heading into the postseason and unranked Hart has been a top-10 team at multiple points. All but one of Hart’s losses were to Division 1 or 2 teams (with the other to Division 3 No. 4 Muskegon Western Michigan Christian). Like Roscommon, Beal City and McBain also are from the Highland Conference, with Beal winning its lone meeting with the Ramblers on Oct. 15 in five sets. Roscommon did sweep both during the regular season.
Mt. Morris
Saginaw Valley Lutheran (53-9-3) vs. Cass City (29-8-5)
Mt. Morris (31-18-8) vs. St. Louis (34-4-3)
Valley Lutheran spent most of this fall ranked No. 1 and ended the regular season at No. 2 after a late loss to Roscommon. All but one of the team’s other defeats were to Division 1 and 2 teams, and the Chargers are seeking a fourth straight Regional title. This will be the first time they’ve seen No. 9 Cass City in two years, but the Red Hawks ended Valley Lutheran’s tournament runs three seasons in a row from 2022-24 and have faced a similarly rigorous schedule with similar results. St. Louis is an honorable mention in the coaches poll and riding a 12-match winning streak, but has an intriguing opponent in host Mt. Morris, which is playing in Division 3 for the first time after formerly playing in Division 2. The Panthers continued to face several larger schools this fall and tied St. Louis in Sept. 12 tournament play.
Ottawa Lake Whiteford
Hanover-Horton (33-10-5) vs. Monroe St. Mary Catholic Central (31-3)
Clinton (39-9-1) vs. Quincy (31-9-1)
This is another impressive group with Clinton ranked No. 7, St. Mary No. 8 and Hanover-Horton No. 10, and Quincy unranked but 24-4 since losing to St. Mary in tournament play in mid-September. The Kestrels have won nine straight Regional titles and reached the Semifinals in Battle Creek again last season, and their only losses this fall were to South Lyon twice and Pontiac Notre Dame Prep – and St. Mary also defeated NDP in tournament play that same day. Hanover-Horton will be seeking to avenge last year’s Regional Final loss to the Kestrels, and the Comets have seen their share of strong opponents as well – with a split against Clinton, which is noted above and has taken all of its losses and the tie from ranked opponents and also has wins over Roscommon and Beal City.
DIVISION 4
Athens
St. Joseph Michigan Lutheran (32-10-1) vs. Battle Creek St. Philip (32-13-4)
Mendon (24-12-4) vs. Kalamazoo Hackett Catholic Prep (23-6-3)
One of the strongest overall groups in any division might be this one in Division 4, with St. Philip ranked No. 4, Michigan Lutheran No. 7, Hackett No. 10 and Mendon last season’s Division 4 runner-up. St. Philip was stopped by the Hornets last season and is seeking its first Regional title since its most recent Finals championship year of 2021. The Tigers haven’t lost to a Division 4 opponent this season – and defeated Mendon on Sept. 29 – but Michigan Lutheran has won eight of its last nine matches and has plenty of experience against larger teams as well as it pursues a first Regional title. Hackett has won 11 of its last 12 matches and is hoping to break through for its first Regional championship since 2001.
Concord
Concord (25-8-3) vs. Adrian Lenawee Christian (41-6)
Hillsdale Academy (23-8) vs. Fulton (24-13-4)
Top-ranked Lenawee Christian has held down the top spot all but one week this season, and the Cougars have certainly impressed with wins over Division 3 ranked Clinton, Traverse City St. Francis and Plymouth Christian Academy. Lenawee Christian has a solid pair of wins as well over honorable mention Hillsdale Academy, which otherwise has lost this season only to Clinton and Battle Creek St. Philip. Concord also is an honorable mention and has won 13 of its last 14 matches as it seeks a second Regional title in three years. Fulton is seeking its first ever but is another great story coming off claiming its first District championship since 2015.
Ishpeming
Hancock (30-2-1) vs. Ishpeming (18-8-2)
Crystal Falls Forest Park (36-4-1) vs. Ewen-Trout Creek (14-8-2)
Hancock defeated Forest Park to win their 2024 Regional, and Forest Park returned the favor last fall in a Regional Semifinal before advancing to championship week with a clincher against Ishpeming. Hancock’s only losses this season came to Division 2 Kingsford during the season’s first tournament, and the Bulldogs won their only meetings with Forest Park and the Hematites. Forest Park will be seeing Ewen-Trout Creek and potentially Ishpeming for the first time this fall but defeated E-TC in District play a year ago. Ishpeming has come on over the last month with 10 wins and a tie over its last 12 matches, and E-TC’s District-clinching win over Ontonagon avenged an Oct. 14 loss.
PHOTOS (Top) Allendale (red jerseys) and Fruitport players focus on a hit from Allendale’s back row during the Falcons’ Division 2 District-winning victory Thursday. (Middle) Lansing Catholic’s Katherine Partin (12) sends a kill attempt toward a Williamston block during the Cougars’ Division 2 clincher Thursday. (Allendale/Fruitport photo by Michigan Sports Media. Lansing Catholic/Williamston photo by TCP Photography.)