New Math: Division & Multiplication Problems
July 25, 2017
By Jack Roberts
MHSAA Executive Director
This is the second part in a series on MHSAA tournament classification, past and present, that will be published over the next two weeks. This series originally ran in this spring's edition of MHSAA benchmarks.
High school tournament classifications went viral before there was social media and most of us knew what “viral” meant.
Much as a virus infects computers today or has created epidemics of disease around the world for centuries, high school tournament classification – once introduced – tends to spread uncontrollably. Once started, it tends to keep expanding and rarely contracts.
While we are still some distance from providing every team a trophy as a result of expanding high school tournament classification across the country, there is criticism nevertheless that we are headed in that direction – a philosophy which is supposed to exist only in local youth sports for our youngest children.
Michigan could be blamed for all this. Michigan is generally accepted as the first state to provide different classifications for season-ending tournaments for different sized schools. It started a century ago. Today, every state has various classifications for its tournaments in most if not all sports. And it is a bit ironic that Michigan – creator of the classification chaos – more than most other states has kept the number of tournament classes or divisions under control.
Yes, there is evidence that tournament classifications have expanded over the years in Michigan, especially with the relatively recent introduction of tournaments in football and the late 1990s’ move from classes to divisions in most MHSAA tournaments. But the MHSAA Representative Council has held true to its word when it expanded the playoffs for football from four classes to eight divisions: this is needed because of unique factors of football, factors that exist in no other sport; and all other sports should be capped at a maximum of four classes or divisions.
Kentucky is the preeminent defender of single-class basketball. All of its 276 high schools compete for the single state championship for each gender. In Indiana, there are still open wounds from its move in 1998 from one to four classes for its 400 schools in basketball.
Multi-class tournaments have tended to increase the number of non-public school champions, which some states are trying to lower through enrollment “multipliers,” and also tend to increase the number of repeat champions, which some states are trying to affect with “success factors” which lift smaller schools into classifications for larger schools if they take home too many trophies.
While there is considerable evidence that state tournaments do as much bad as good for educational athletics, state associations persist in providing postseason tournaments because, on balance, the experiences are supposed to be good for student-athletes. And once we reach that conclusion it is just a small leap to believe that if the tournaments are good for a few, they must be better for more – which leads to creating more and more tournament classifications. One becomes two classes, then three, then four and so forth.
While the argument is that more classifications or divisions provides more students with opportunities to compete and win, it is undeniable that the experience changes as the number of tournament classifications expands. It is not possible for state associations to provide the same level of support when tournament classifications expand to multiple venues playing simultaneously. For example, there is less audio and video broadcast potential at each venue, and less media coverage to each venue. Focus is diluted and fans diminished at each championship.
No one can argue reasonably that today's two-day MHSAA Football Finals of eight championship games has the same pizazz as the one-day, four-games event conducted prior to 1990.
In some states the number of divisions has grown so much that it is difficult to see much difference between the many season-ending state championship games and a regular-season event in the same sport.
It is a balancing act. And Michigan has been studying that balance longer than any other state, and charting a steadier course than most.
Addition by Division
The shift to Divisions for MHSAA Tournament play in numerous sports has added up to a greater number of champions for teams and individuals across the state. Following are the sports currently employing a divisional format, and the procedures for determining enrollment and classification.
In 23 statewide or Lower Peninsula tournaments, schools which sponsor the sport are currently divided into nearly equal divisions. They are:
- Baseball - 4 Divisions
- Boys Bowling - 4 Divisions
- Girls Bowling - 4 Divisions
- Girls Competitive Cheer - 4 Divisions
- LP Boys Cross Country - 4 Divisions
- LP Girls Cross Country - 4 Divisions
- LP Boys Golf - 4 Divisions
- LP Girls Golf - 4 Divisions
- Ice Hockey - 3 Divisions
- Boys Lacrosse - 2 Divisions
- Girls Lacrosse - 2 Divisions
- Boys Skiing - 2 Divisions
- Girls Skiing - 2 Divisions
- LP Boys Soccer - 4 Divisions LP
- Girls Soccer - 4 Divisions
- Girls Softball - 4 Divisions
- LP Boys Swimming & Diving - 3 Divisions
- LP Girls Swimming & Diving - 3 Divisions
- LP Boys Tennis - 4 Divisions
- LP Girls Tennis - 4 Divisions
- LP Boys Track & Field - 4 Divisions
- LP Girls Track & Field - 4 Divisions
- Wrestling - 4 Divisions
Lists of schools for each division of these 23 tournaments are posted on MHSAA.com approximately April 1. Listings of schools in Upper Peninsula tournaments for their sports are also posted on MHSAA.com. The lists are based on school memberships and sports sponsorships in effect or anticipated for the following school year, as known to the MHSAA office as of a date in early March.
In football, the 256 schools which qualify for MHSAA 11-player playoffs are placed in eight equal divisions annually on Selection Sunday. Beginning in 2017, the 8-player divisions will be determined in a like manner on Selection Sunday as well, with 32 qualifying schools placed in two divisions.
Schools have the option to play in any higher division in one or more sports for a minimum of two years.
The deadlines for "opt-ups" are as follows:
- Applications for fall sports must be submitted by April 15
- Applications for winter sports must be submitted by Aug. 15
- Applications for spring sports must be submitted by Oct. 15
Subsequent to the date of these postings for these tournaments, no school will have its division raised or lowered by schools opening or closing, schools adding or dropping sports, schools exercising the option to play in a higher division, or approval or dissolution of cooperative programs.
When the same sport is conducted for boys and girls in the same season (e.g., track & field and cross country), the gender that has the most sponsoring schools controls the division breaks for both genders.
Charlevoix Championship Tradition Reborn with Team, Individual Finals Sweep
November 1, 2025
BROOKLYN, Mich. — The Charlevoix boys cross country dynasty took place decades before Hunter Eaton was born, but that history is never far from him and his teammates.
“You think of those guys and all the history and we’ve got to start it back up a little bit,” Eaton said. “We’ve got to keep up with it.”
Consider Charlevoix’s tradition revived.
The Red Rayders clinched their first MHSAA Finals championship since winning seven Class C titles during a 10-year span from 1982-91 by emerging victorious in a three-way battle Saturday at Michigan International Speedway.
Charlevoix scored 131 points to win by seven over Lansing Catholic. Jackson Lumen Christi was third with 143.
In the process, Eaton became the first Charlevoix boy to win an MHSAA Finals individual championship since two-time winner Scott Miller won the Class C team race in 1989. Eaton finished in 15:30.8 to win by three seconds over Gage Hoffman of Central Montcalm.
The Red Rayders did their alumni proud.
The team even has a Drenth, junior Maxwell Drenth, who continues a family lineage. Walt Drenth coached at Charlevoix in the 1980s and is the former coach at Michigan State University.
“We have Walt Drenth come talk to us every year,” Eaton said. “He’s our coach’s brother. They had a brother, Jeff Drenth, who passed away. We have another guy who came to us last summer, Bill Taylor (from the 1982 and 1983 championship teams). He’s a really good guy. We also have some other alumni who come. It’s very motivating, because they want to see us do well.”
Eaton was in a three-way battle with Hoffman and Christian Craanen of Monroe St. Mary Catholic Central through two miles, as the runners were separated by one second. Eaton opened up a four-second lead during the third mile and had enough left to win a kick to the finish.
“It was just like, ‘I’ve got to go,’” Eaton said. “I don’t care how I feel. I’ve just got to run right through the line. I was getting tired though. If there was another 100 (meters), I don’t know.”
Eaton was ninth last year and 42nd as a freshman. Had he continued on his original path, he might have been playing football for Charlevoix this fall instead of running cross country.
“I started running in fifth grade,” Eaton said. “I played Pop Warner football in fourth grade. The coach told my dad I’d be a good cross country runner. My dad made me think about cross country, and I did. It obviously worked out. I’m glad I chose this sport.”
Ryder Hopkins was 10th in 15:58.4, Matthew Solomon 19th in 16:10.2, Drenth 57th in 16:36.5 and Aurie Selph 119th in 17:12.2 for Charlevoix.
PHOTOS (Top) Charlevoix’s Hunter Eaton approaches the finish line first in the Division 3 Final at Michigan International Speedway. (Middle) The Rayders’ Ryder Hopkins (995) leads a group down the stretch including Jackson Lumen Christi’s Gibson Shore (1045) and Centreville’s Will Hulin (2015). (Click for more from RunMichigan.com.)