Add, Subtract, Divide, Multiply: MHSAA Not Alone
July 25, 2017
By Rob Kaminski
MHSAA benchmarks editor
This is the third part in a series on MHSAA tournament classification, past and present, that will be published over the next two weeks. This series originally ran in this spring's edition of MHSAA benchmarks.
As the MHSAA faces its most recent classification task with 8-Player Football, and opinions continue to swirl about as to the method, timeframe, location and other procedures, a look around the country provides plenty of company among state association brethren factoring variables into their own equations.
In the Pacific Northwest, the Oregon School Activities Association Football Playoffs are under public scrutiny as leadership ponders a five or six classification format beginning with the 2018-19 school year.
The OSAA has crowned six champions on the gridiron since 2006-07. Many of the state’s smaller schools would like to keep it that way, while larger schools lean toward a five-classification system, citing larger leagues, ease of travel and credibility to state championships as the advantages.
Still others would prefer more than six classes, pointing to safety issues and the opportunity to increase participation numbers as positives.
Moving southeast of Oregon, the Nevada Interscholastic Activities Association recently voted to hold serve on a classification proposal that was volleyed to the membership.
However, changes still could be forthcoming by as early as the 2018-19 season which would add a fifth classification in more populated southern Nevada while allowing northern schools to participate in four classifications. Such divisions could mean no state championship for the fifth class in southern Nevada.
Because of that, the NIAA wants equal numbers of schools in each classification on both ends of the state. Complicating the issue is the fact that the 24 largest schools in the state, by enrollment, are all in Clark County in Southern Nevada.
Across Nevada’s border into Arizona, charter schools are asking the Arizona Interscholastic Association to reconsider classification that was voted upon and approved in September 2015. That agreement called for the largest 33 percent of charter schools by enrollment to be placed in the state’s largest school classification, 3A, the middle 33 percent into 2A, and the smallest 33 percent into 1A.
Less than two years later the charter schools have had a change of heart and have asked to be considered the same as other Arizona public schools and be placed appropriately by enrollment beginning with the 2018-19 school year.
The situation in Arizona further illustrates how the public/private debate that all state associations have faced throughout existence now has the added dynamic of rapidly growing charter schools in today’s educational system, along with virtual school enrollment.
In the nation’s heartland, Nebraska has retooled its football classifications by using enrollment of boys students only in its schools rather than total enrollment. The Nebraska School Activities Association football-playing schools will kick off the 2018 season using this alignment.
Nebraska has three classes of 11-player football, with the smallest class divided in two, Class C-1 and C-2. The state also will have 8-player football for boys enrollments under 47, and the NSAA will sponsor a new 6-player tournament in 2018 for schools with 27 or fewer boys.
“This is a good proposal because some schools have a sizable imbalance between the number of boys and girls, and there’s a large gap (in enrollment) between the largest and smallest schools in Classes A and B,” NSAA executive director Jim Tenopir said. “I think this addresses both of those concerns.”
Swimmers in Georgia, meanwhile, will feel like they are moving with the current, rather than upstream in 2017-18, as the Georgia High School Association recently doubled the number of team championship events from two to four.
Swim enthusiasts can also count on longer days at the finals, as the top 30 finishers from the prelims will advance to the finals instead of 20, and all championship events will have three heats versus two.
Refusing to Settle for Less Than Best, Stoney Creek Shines to Complete 3-Peat
By
Tom Kendra
Special for MHSAA.com
March 6, 2026
MOUNT PLEASANT – It really hadn’t been Rochester Hills Stoney Creek’s year going into the MHSAA Finals.
The Cougars were the two-time reigning Division 1 champions, but they didn’t win their conference or their District or their Regional.
But on the biggest stage of all at Central Michigan University’s McGuirk Arena, the Cougars delivered once again.
Stoney Creek, which entered the postseason ranked No. 5, used another clutch performance in Round 3 to “three-peat” as Division 1 champion with 789.94 points – once again barely edging neighboring rivals Rochester (789.52) and Rochester Adams (789.16).
“Things haven’t been going our way this year, but these girls never stopped believing in themselves,” said 23rd-year Stoney Creek coach Tricia Williams, who won her fifth Finals championship.
“They peaked at the state finals, and I couldn’t be more proud of them.”
It looked for a while that the Division 1 title might go to a West Michigan school for the first time since 2015, as Grandville held the lead after Round 1 and Round 2 before struggling in the final round and finishing fifth (785.56).
Brighton was also right in the mix in third place heading into the final round, but backed up a spot to fourth (788.58).
It was in the “money round” of Round 3, as has so often been the case in past years, where the three Rochester schools pulled away with their complex and more difficult routines – much to the delight of the rabid fan bases from each school.
Rochester posted the best Round 3 score of 321.80 to jump from fifth place up to second. Adams turned in a 321.00 to move from fourth to third place.
That just left Stoney Creek, going last in the final round for the second consecutive year, to see if it could do enough to hold off its rivals. The Cougars posted the same score as Adams, 321.00, to win by 0.42 over Rochester.
“I think the reason that we won today is because we didn’t win at Districts and Regionals,” said Stoney Creek’s Audrey Harvath, one of 13 seniors on the 26-athlete roster.
“We knew we had to keep climbing. We looked at each of our rounds in slow motion and tried to find every little thing that we could possibly improve, and that made the difference.”
Harvath was one of three returning first-team all-staters for the Cougars, along with fellow seniors Mia Badalucco and Natalie Marco.
Seniors Taylor Brandimarte and Kendall Keller and sophomore Kate Kacy were second team all-state last season, while senior Cassidy Niester and Isabel Williams were honorable mention.
It was not only the third-straight championship for Stoney Creek, but the eighth straight for a Rochester school and the 10th in 11 years – with Stoney Creek winning four and Adams and Rochester three each. The only non-Rochester school to win the title in Division 1 during that stretch was Sterling Heights Stevenson in 2018.
“At the end of the day, we are grateful to be in each other’s backyards because it forces us to keep getting better,” said fourth-year Rochester coach Samantha Dean. “What can I say, it came down to tenths of a point again. We can say we had the best Round 3 in the state, which is certainly something to be proud of.”
The three schools have battled each other for the last three Saturdays, with each of them winning a title – Adams at Districts, Rochester at Regionals and Stoney Creek at the Finals.
It was truly a bittersweet moment as those 13 Stoney Creek seniors lingered on the McGuirk Arena floor long after most of the fans had filed out.
The Cougars became the 13th competitive cheer program in MHSAA history to win at least three Finals championships in a row.
“Going for back-to-back was hard enough, and we knew trying to get three in a row would be even harder against some powerhouse competition,” said Harvath. “It obviously took every last ounce of energy that we had.”