Casting Lines for Future Tournaments
August 12, 2016
By Jack Roberts
MHSAA Executive Director
The MHSAA is best known to the public for the tournaments it conducts to conclude the fall, winter and spring seasons each school year.
These tournaments, the first and largest program of the MHSAA, have survived the Vietnam War, the Korean conflict and two World Wars. They have survived the technology bubble, the housing collapse, the energy crisis and the Great Depression.
MHSAA tournaments existed at the dawn of aviation and at the time of our nation’s lunar landing. Popes, presidents and governors have changed and changed again and again, and MHSAA tournaments roll on year after year.
But the sense of tradition and permanence and inevitability of MHSAA tournaments doesn’t dissuade us from asking questions about our tournaments, even some of the most basic questions. Here are two.
Question #1
I have long been and will always be an advocate for a Ryder Cup format for the MHSAA Golf Finals, and a team tennis approach to the MHSAA Tennis Finals; but 90 years of tradition is hard to overcome. Might this be a more exciting format? Could it be co-ed? Could it reverse the decline in boys tennis participation, and increase girls golf participation? Wouldn’t it be fun to try?
Periodically, the International Olympic Committee requires each of the designated Olympic sports to defend its status, to state its case why the sport should remain a part of the Olympic program. Then, after a series or votes that retain one sport at a time, the IOC drops the sport that makes the weakest case. It does so to make room for one of the previously unlisted sports that makes the best case for inclusion.
This would appear to keep the existing Olympic sports on their toes, and to keep the Olympic movement fresh and reflective of modern trends in sports.
While I would not enjoy the controversy, I can see the potential for some positive results if the MHSAA were to invoke the same policy for determining the 14 tournaments it will provide for girls and the 14 for boys.
This might cause us to consider more deeply what a high school sport should look like, or at least what an MHSAA tournament sport should stand for.
On the one hand, we might be inclined to drop tournaments for those sports that involve mostly non-faculty coaches and non-school venues, or require cooperative programs to generate enough participants to support a team, or resort almost entirely to non-school funding, or cater to individuals more than teams.
Or perhaps this process would cause policymakers to forget traditional thinking and ask: “In this day and age, should we shake off traditional notions of sport and consider more where modern kids are coming from?” That might mean fewer team sports and more individual sports, more “extreme” sports like snowboarding and skateboarding, and more lifetime sports, meaning not just golf and tennis and running sports, but also fishing and even shooting sports.
Currently, MHSAA policy states that the MHSAA will consider sponsorship of a tournament series for any sport which 64 member schools conduct on an interscholastic basis as a result of action by the governing boards of those schools.
Should the only question be how many schools sponsor a sport, or must an activity also have certain qualities and/or avoid certain “defects?” What should an MHSAA tournament sport look like and stand for?
Question #2
Bristling from criticism that his association is a money-grabbing exploiter of children, my counterpart in another state said, “If we were running our programs just to make money, we would do very many things very differently.” I knew exactly what he meant.
Because we care about the health and welfare of students, because we mean what we say that the athletic program needs to maximize the ways it enhances the school experience while minimizing academic conflicts, and because we try to model our claim that no sport is a minor sport when it comes to its potential to teach young people life lessons, we operate our programs in ways that make promoters, marketers and business entrepreneurs laugh, cry or cringe.
If money were the only object, we would seed and select sites to assure the teams that attracted the most spectators had the best chance to advance in our tournaments, regardless of the travel for any team or its fan base. If money were the only object, we would never schedule two tournaments to overlap and compete for public attention, much less tolerate three or four overlapping events. If money were the only object, we would allow signage like NASCAR events and promotions like minor league baseball games.
Those approaches to event sponsorship may not be all wrong; they’re just not all right for us. And we will live with the consequences of our belief system.
During a typical school year, more than 20 percent of the MHSAA’s 2,097 District, Regional and Final tournaments lose money. Not a single site in golf, skiing or tennis makes a single penny. In no sport did every District, Regional and Final site have revenue in excess of direct expenses.
In fact, in only three sports – boys and girls basketball and football – is revenue so much greater than direct expenses overall that it helps to pay for all the other tournaments in which the MHSAA invests.
That’s right: invests. When we present our budget to our board, we talk about the MHSAA’s investment in providing tournament opportunities in all those sports and all those places that cannot sustain the cost of those events on their own. How much is this investment worth to students, schools and society?
These two are core questions that require our focus far in advance of talk about scheduling, site selection, seeding and the myriad matters that too often hijack our time and attention.
After Season of Historic Finishes, Mesick Boys Looking Forward to Another Run
By
Tom Spencer
Special for MHSAA.com
November 22, 2025
Mesick just finished the best boys cross country season in school history.
And the Bulldogs have even higher expectations for next year.
Mesick won a conference championship for the first time, and qualified for the MHSAA Lower Peninsula Division 4 Final for the first time in 38 years.
And the Bulldogs did it all without a senior in the lineup – meaning the entire lineup could be back for more in 2026.
“We’re coming back ready to stay fresh and just honestly do a lot more than we did this year,” said Kyle Redman, who ran a 15:40 to break his own school record and capture first place at his team’s Regional meet. “We want to keep building off that and dig deeper to go further.”
Redman was often the number one runner for Mesick, as was his twin brother Tyler, who finished just seven seconds behind him at the Regional.
Unfortunately, Tyler Redmond aggravated an ongoing hamstring injury and was unable to run in the Final.
“Every goal on our checklist, we hit,” said fourth-year Mesick coach Josh Kaskinen. “We won the conference. We qualified for states, and then right after that Regional race Ty found that he wasn't going to be able to go for states.”
Mesick had entered just six runners in the Final, and called on Harper Musta to step up just as he did during the conference championship race.
Musta, who was battling injuries too as he entered the Final, was the team’s number six runner all season. He ran as the fifth at Michigan International Speedway, ensuring Mesick could place as a team.
“I want to pat Harper on the back as I was a little nervous that we weren't going to score points at state even though we were ranked 11th coming in,” Kaskinen said. “Harper stepped up so that we could actually score and gave us all the experience that we need for next year.”
Despite missing a definite all-state candidate, Mesick still finished 21st at MIS, with Kyle Redman 11th.
The Bulldogs were not surprised Musta came through. He had done it earlier in the season, garnering a lot of credit for the school’s West Michigan D League title.
The Bulldogs narrowly came out on top of the conference championship race with 45 points. Mason County Eastern finished runner-up with 46, and Grand Traverse Academy wound up in third place with 47 points.
“Winning the conference was a big accomplishment,” Tyler Redman said. “For three or four years we were trying to just get people to run cross country, and everybody fought to actually get good at it.”
Kyle Redman led the way in the conference with a first-place finish. Tyler Redman was second. But it was first-year runner and sophomore Musta who found a way to figure in the scoring for the Bulldogs. He didn’t finish in the school’s top five but he did finish ahead of other schools’ top five runners.
“Harper is our assistant coach's older son, and he never ran before,” Kaskinen noted. “I told him leading into that championship meet that his job was to focus on Mason County Eastern's number five guy. I knew it was going to be a close race. And he was able to do it.”
Musta vividly recalls the race, passing Eastern’s fifth runner midway. He admits he wasn’t sure he was up to the challenge. The race gave him his first appreciation of the mental aspects of running.
“It was a pretty interesting experience,” Musta said. “I actually had a goal in mind, and I had to keep on speeding up and pushing myself. And it was a lot more thinking than I'm usually used to.”
Musta expects to use that experience to help Mesick to even more success in the years ahead, as does freshman and number three runner Kyle Doty and the Bulldogs’ other regular scorers Gunnar Hallett and Alex Kastl.
With everyone returning, Kaskinen is already looking forward to next season.
“I do think it's going to be a little more competitive for that final scoring spot next year,” he said. “It's kind of cliche, but they were like a brotherhood. They really just came together, and they were closer than I've ever seen a group of kids before.”
Having identical twins lead the team and winning races has been pretty special for Mesick runners.
“It's definitely cool and interesting because we’ve been good friends for a while,” Hallett said. “They're kind of pushing me to do more. Sometimes we just get together and run. And then instantly it's a bit bigger group, and it's easier to do longer runs.”
The twins first started running in an elementary school club led by Rhonda Workman. They played football in middle school.
And while their teammates can tell the difference between the twins, opponents rarely can. All they often know is the guy finishing first was named Redman.
“We get to work off each other, and we have training partners throughout the whole season,” Kyle Redman said. “And it is fun when we’re warming up for the race and they'll be like, ‘Are you Kyle or Ty?’ And then you can just mess with them and they'll never actually know the truth.”
Tom Spencer is a longtime MHSAA-registered basketball and soccer official, and former softball and baseball official, and he also has coached in the northern Lower Peninsula area. He previously has written for the Saginaw News, Bay County Sports Page and Midland Daily News. He can be reached at [email protected] with story ideas for Manistee, Wexford, Missaukee, Roscommon, Ogemaw, Iosco, Alcona, Oscoda, Crawford, Kalkaska, Grand Traverse, Benzie, Leelanau, Antrim, Otsego, Montmorency, Alpena, Presque Isle, Cheboygan, Charlevoix and Emmet counties.
PHOTOS (Top) Mesick runners line up for the start of the West Michigan D League championship race Oct. 15 at Marion. (Middle) Twins Kyle and Ty Redman lead the league finale. (Below) Mesick’s Finals qualifiers take a photo at the finish line at Michigan International Speedway. (Photos courtesy of the Mesick boys cross country program.)